PDEC vs. BSEP
PDEC (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December) and BSEP (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - PDEC tracks the S&P 500 while BSEP tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PDEC returned 8.43%/yr vs 10.62%/yr for BSEP. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
PDEC vs. BSEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDEC achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than BSEP's 6.02% return.
PDEC
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 4.93%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- —
BSEP
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- —
PDEC vs. BSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December | 4.93% | 12.91% | 9.46% | 17.43% | -5.95% | 9.59% | 8.45% | 0.91% |
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 6.02% | 14.80% | 16.96% | 20.94% | -9.20% | 14.64% | 12.44% | 1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDEC and BSEP is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between PDEC and BSEP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
PDEC vs. BSEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PDEC
BSEP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PDEC
BSEP
Financial Services
PDEC
BSEP
Communication Services
PDEC
BSEP
Consumer Cyclical
PDEC
BSEP
Healthcare
PDEC
BSEP
Industrials
PDEC
BSEP
Consumer Defensive
PDEC
BSEP
Energy
PDEC
BSEP
Utilities
PDEC
BSEP
Real Estate
PDEC
BSEP
Basic Materials
PDEC
BSEP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDEC vs. BSEP — Risk / Return Rank
PDEC
BSEP
PDEC vs. BSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDEC | BSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.47 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.30 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.46 | 16.41 | +1.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDEC | BSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 2.41 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.92 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.88 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
PDEC vs. BSEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDEC drawdown since its inception was -19.31%, smaller than the maximum BSEP drawdown of -23.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDEC and BSEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDEC | BSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.31% | -23.98% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.78% | -5.70% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.77% | -13.36% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.53% | -15.02% | +3.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.80% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -2.74% | +0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 1.14% | -0.21% |
Volatility
PDEC vs. BSEP - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) at 1.26%. This indicates that PDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDEC | BSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 1.26% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.06% | 5.89% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.81% | 7.81% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.92% | 11.62% | -2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.96% | 13.76% | -2.80% |
PDEC vs. BSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PDEC and BSEP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
PDEC vs. BSEP - Dividend Comparison
Neither PDEC nor BSEP has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.39% |
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, PDEC and BSEP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PDEC has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to BSEP (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDEC dropped -19.31% vs BSEP's -23.98%.
On 5-year performance, BSEP leads with 10.62% vs 8.43% for PDEC. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, BSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSEP has performed better with a 10.62% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PDEC and BSEP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
PDEC and BSEP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PDEC tracks S&P 500, while BSEP tracks S&P 500 Index.
BSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDEC and BSEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer