PDEC vs. APXM

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PDEC (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December) and APXM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. PDEC is passively managed, while APXM is actively managed. Over the past year, PDEC returned 15.66% vs 5.02% for APXM. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PDEC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for APXM.

Performance

PDEC vs. APXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDEC achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly higher than APXM's 2.67% return.

PDEC

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 6.00%
• YTD: 7.08%
• 1Y: 15.66%
• 3Y*: 11.53%
• 5Y*: 8.66%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.78%

APXM

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.55%
• 6M: 2.34%
• YTD: 2.67%
• 1Y: 5.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
APXM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April	$1.16K	$22.80K	$50.82K
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December	$643.33K	$1.01M	$1.86M

PDEC vs. APXM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December	7.08%	18.91%
APXM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April	2.67%	5.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PDEC and APXM is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025	0.75

The correlation between PDEC and APXM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PDEC vs. APXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PDEC

PDEC Risk / Return Rank: 89
PDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 92

APXM

APXM Risk / Return Rank: 98
APXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
APXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
APXM Omega Ratio Rank: 98
APXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
APXM Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PDEC vs. APXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PDEC	APXM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	3.78	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	5.99	-2.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.99	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	8.42	-5.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.60	43.30	-26.70

PDEC vs. APXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is lower than the APXM Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDEC and APXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PDEC vs. APXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDEC drawdown since its inception was -19.31%, which is greater than APXM's maximum drawdown of -0.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDEC and APXM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDEC	APXM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.31%	-0.60%	-18.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.78%	-0.60%	-4.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.99%	-0.05%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	0.12%	+0.83%

Volatility

PDEC vs. APXM - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM) at 0.61%. This indicates that PDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDEC	APXM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.71%	0.61%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.22%	1.22%	+4.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.86%	1.34%	+5.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.96%	1.41%	+7.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.88%	1.41%	+9.47%

PDEC vs. APXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDEC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than APXM's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

PDEC vs. APXM - Dividend Comparison

Neither PDEC nor APXM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PDEC and APXM in my portfolio?

PDEC and APXM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PDEC or APXM?

PDEC has higher volatility (1.71%) compared to APXM (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDEC dropped -19.31% vs APXM's -0.60%.

Which ETF is better, PDEC or APXM?

On 1-year performance, PDEC leads with 15.66% vs 5.02% for APXM. On fees, PDEC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, APXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PDEC or APXM?

Over the 1-year period, PDEC has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 5.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PDEC or APXM?

PDEC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for APXM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PDEC or APXM?

PDEC and APXM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PDEC and APXM?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PDEC and 0.85% for APXM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.