PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDDL vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDDL vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (PDDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDDL achieves a -49.84% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 545.56% return.


PDDL

1D
-2.29%
1M
-33.70%
YTD
-49.84%
6M
-54.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MULL

1D
-26.21%
1M
49.48%
YTD
545.56%
6M
797.25%
1Y
3,465.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDDL vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PDDL
GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF
-49.84%7.42%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
545.56%347.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PDDL and MULL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDDL vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDDL

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDDL vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (PDDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PDDL vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDDLMULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

5.14

-5.89

Drawdowns

PDDL vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDDL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDDL and MULL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDDLMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.62%

-72.29%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.18%

-37.74%

-29.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.89%

-20.65%

-9.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.00%

Volatility

PDDL vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDDLMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

66.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

111.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.58%

136.34%

-69.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.58%

138.33%

-71.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.58%

138.33%

-71.75%

PDDL vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PDDL and MULL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

PDDL vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

PDDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than MULL's 0.06% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


PDDL and MULL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PDDL and MULL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

PDDL has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.06% for MULL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDDL and MULL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer