PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDD vs. UAMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PDD vs. UAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDD achieves a -28.07% return, which is significantly lower than UAMY's 40.24% return.


PDD

1D
0.32%
1M
-14.89%
YTD
-28.07%
6M
-27.15%
1Y
-18.91%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
-7.73%
10Y*

UAMY

1D
-3.96%
1M
-18.23%
YTD
40.24%
6M
25.71%
1Y
140.27%
3Y*
174.60%
5Y*
49.67%
10Y*
39.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDD vs. UAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PDD
Pinduoduo Inc.
-28.07%16.91%-33.71%79.41%39.88%-67.19%369.78%68.54%-15.32%
UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation
40.24%183.62%610.84%-48.86%-2.19%-4.64%35.58%-33.62%10.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PDD and UAMY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PDD:

$120.71B

UAMY:

$996.95M

EPS

PDD:

CN¥64.39

UAMY:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

PDD:

1.86

UAMY:

23.26

PB Ratio

PDD:

1.94

UAMY:

7.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

PDD:

CN¥441.76B

UAMY:

$39.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PDD:

CN¥247.30B

UAMY:

$4.34M

EBITDA (TTM)

PDD:

CN¥134.30B

UAMY:

-$15.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDD vs. UAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDD
PDD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDD Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDD Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

UAMY
UAMY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
UAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDD vs. UAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDDUAMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.23

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

1.80

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

3.10

-4.18

PDD vs. UAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDD Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the UAMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDD and UAMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDD vs. UAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDD drawdown since its inception was -87.41%, smaller than the maximum UAMY drawdown of -96.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDD and UAMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDDUAMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.41%

-96.44%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.14%

-74.30%

+33.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.40%

-74.30%

+25.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.88%

-80.46%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.79%

-59.70%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.32%

-66.41%

+27.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.55%

43.23%

-23.68%

Volatility

PDD vs. UAMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD) is 14.35%, while United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a volatility of 30.55%. This indicates that PDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDDUAMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.35%

30.55%

-16.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.50%

93.03%

-67.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.48%

132.02%

-99.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.09%

95.07%

-26.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.37%

101.02%

-31.65%

Dividends

PDD vs. UAMY - Dividend Comparison

Neither PDD nor UAMY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PDD vs. UAMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pinduoduo Inc. and United States Antimony Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
105.59B
6.78M
(PDD) Total Revenue
(UAMY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PDD values in CNY, UAMY values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


PDD and UAMY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UAMY has higher volatility (30.55%) compared to PDD (14.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDD dropped -87.41% vs UAMY's -96.44%.

UAMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDD and UAMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer