PDD vs. LI
PDD (Pinduoduo Inc.) and LI (Li Auto Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — PDD in Internet Retail, LI in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 5 years, PDD returned -7.73%/yr vs -12.64%/yr for LI. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PDD vs. LI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDD achieves a -28.07% return, which is significantly lower than LI's -15.53% return.
PDD
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -14.89%
- YTD
- -28.07%
- 6M
- -27.15%
- 1Y
- -18.91%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- -7.73%
- 10Y*
- —
LI
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -22.74%
- YTD
- -15.53%
- 6M
- -16.28%
- 1Y
- -48.49%
- 3Y*
- -23.14%
- 5Y*
- -12.64%
- 10Y*
- —
PDD vs. LI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDD Pinduoduo Inc. | -28.07% | 16.91% | -33.71% | 79.41% | 39.88% | -67.19% | 111.44% |
LI Li Auto Inc. | -15.53% | -29.43% | -35.91% | 83.48% | -36.45% | 11.34% | 86.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDD and LI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.43 |
Fundamentals
PDD:
$120.71B
LI:
$14.50B
PDD:
CN¥64.39
LI:
-CN¥1.74
PDD:
1.86
LI:
0.92
PDD:
1.94
LI:
1.41
PDD:
CN¥441.76B
LI:
CN¥108.98B
PDD:
CN¥247.30B
LI:
CN¥17.42B
PDD:
CN¥134.30B
LI:
-CN¥2.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDD vs. LI — Risk / Return Rank
PDD
LI
PDD vs. LI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD) and Li Auto Inc. (LI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDD | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.78 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | -0.89 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | -1.35 | +0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDD vs. LI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDD drawdown since its inception was -87.41%, which is greater than LI's maximum drawdown of -70.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDD and LI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDD | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.41% | -70.65% | -16.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.14% | -56.95% | +15.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.40% | -70.65% | +22.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.88% | -70.65% | -10.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.79% | -69.35% | +9.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.32% | -39.93% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.55% | 37.41% | -17.86% |
Volatility
PDD vs. LI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD) is 14.35%, while Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a volatility of 15.12%. This indicates that PDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDD | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.35% | 15.12% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.50% | 28.81% | -3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.48% | 40.30% | -7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.09% | 63.52% | +4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.37% | 68.32% | +1.05% |
Dividends
PDD vs. LI - Dividend Comparison
Neither PDD nor LI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PDD vs. LI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pinduoduo Inc. and Li Auto Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PDD vs. LI - Profitability Comparison
PDD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.98B and revenue of 105.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.
LI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 22.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.
PDD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported an operating income of 21.02B and revenue of 105.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.
LI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported an operating income of -2.95B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.
PDD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported a net income of 12.47B and revenue of 105.59B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.
LI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a net income of -2.28B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in a net margin of -10.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PDD and LI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LI has higher volatility (15.12%) compared to PDD (14.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDD dropped -87.41% vs LI's -70.65%.
PDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDD and LI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer