PDC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO
PDC.TO (Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF) and QQC-F.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - PDC.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index, while QQC-F.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PDC.TO returned 11.43%/yr vs 18.84%/yr for QQC-F.TO. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PDC.TO charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQC-F.TO.
Performance
PDC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDC.TO achieves a 25.42% return, which is significantly higher than QQC-F.TO's 10.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PDC.TO has underperformed QQC-F.TO with an annualized return of 11.43%, while QQC-F.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.84% annualized return.
PDC.TO
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- YTD
- 25.42%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.54%
QQC-F.TO
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.79%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.65%
- 10Y*
- 18.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$73.82K | CA$71.46K | CA$90.55K | |
| CA$2.23M | CA$3.21M | CA$4.40M |
PDC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 25.42% | 21.80% | 16.38% | 6.97% | -4.17% | 30.14% | -5.48% | 25.00% | -11.85% | 10.27% |
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 10.64% | 18.79% | 24.19% | 52.81% | -33.42% | 27.15% | 45.04% | 37.63% | -2.23% | 31.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDC.TO and QQC-F.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012 | 0.40 |
The correlation between PDC.TO and QQC-F.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PDC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PDC.TO
QQC-F.TO
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
PDC.TO
QQC-F.TO
Energy
PDC.TO
QQC-F.TO
Utilities
PDC.TO
QQC-F.TO
Consumer Cyclical
PDC.TO
QQC-F.TO
Communication Services
PDC.TO
QQC-F.TO
Basic Materials
PDC.TO
QQC-F.TO
Real Estate
PDC.TO
QQC-F.TO
Industrials
PDC.TO
QQC-F.TO
Consumer Defensive
PDC.TO
QQC-F.TO
Technology
PDC.TO
QQC-F.TO
Healthcare
PDC.TO
-
QQC-F.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PDC.TO
QQC-F.TO
PDC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDC.TO | QQC-F.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.87 | 1.18 | +0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.99 | 1.52 | +8.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.59 | 4.83 | +31.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDC.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, which is greater than QQC-F.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDC.TO and QQC-F.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDC.TO | QQC-F.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.93% | -36.03% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.86% | -12.98% | +9.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.43% | -22.76% | +12.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.98% | -36.03% | +18.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.93% | -36.03% | -5.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -7.93% | +6.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -5.48% | +1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 4.09% | -3.04% |
Volatility
PDC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) is 2.78%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that PDC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQC-F.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDC.TO | QQC-F.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 6.42% | -3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.60% | 15.83% | -9.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.70% | 19.19% | -10.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.85% | 22.92% | -12.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.28% | 22.73% | -7.45% |
PDC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDC.TO has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than QQC-F.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Dividend Comparison
PDC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than QQC-F.TO's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 3.17% | 3.96% | 4.48% | 4.77% | 4.24% | 3.65% | 5.07% | 4.33% | 5.12% | 4.23% | 3.77% | 4.39% |
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 0.35% | 0.39% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.89% | 0.66% | 0.49% | 0.64% | 0.77% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDC.TO and QQC-F.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQC-F.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQC-F.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDC.TO.
PDC.TO is categorized as Dividend, while QQC-F.TO is Nasdaq-100. PDC.TO tracks NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index, while QQC-F.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PDC.TO and 0.20% for QQC-F.TO.
Find the right allocation for PDC.TO and QQC-F.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer