PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDBZX vs. ABNFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDBZX achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly higher than ABNFX's 0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBZX has outperformed ABNFX with an annualized return of 2.88%, while ABNFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.93% annualized return.


PDBZX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.68%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.88%

ABNFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.46%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.12%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
1.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
0.72%7.70%2.87%7.70%-14.33%-1.46%8.01%14.76%-0.72%6.60%
ABNFX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2
0.19%7.42%1.42%4.29%-13.08%-0.88%10.86%8.08%0.15%3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PDBZX and ABNFX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008

0.90

The correlation between PDBZX and ABNFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDBZX vs. ABNFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDBZX
PDBZX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PDBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

ABNFX
ABNFX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ABNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
ABNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDBZXABNFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

1.71

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

5.13

+1.08

PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDBZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the ABNFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDBZX and ABNFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDBZXABNFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.34

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.00

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.40

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.65

+0.44

Drawdowns

PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDBZX drawdown since its inception was -20.88%, which is greater than ABNFX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBZX and ABNFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDBZXABNFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.88%

-17.69%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-3.09%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.51%

-6.12%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.81%

-17.65%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.88%

-17.69%

-3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-1.92%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-3.29%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.03%

-0.02%

Volatility

PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) has a higher volatility of 2.08% compared to American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) at 1.40%. This indicates that PDBZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABNFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDBZXABNFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

1.40%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.30%

2.83%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35%

3.95%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.05%

5.96%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

4.89%

+0.48%

PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDBZX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ABNFX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Dividend Comparison

PDBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than ABNFX's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABNFX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2
4.38%4.37%4.55%3.19%2.37%2.07%5.15%3.72%2.65%2.10%2.31%2.24%
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
4.57%4.54%4.79%4.60%5.73%2.73%2.94%10.36%4.01%2.87%3.92%3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PDBZX and ABNFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PDBZX has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to ABNFX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBZX dropped -20.88% vs ABNFX's -17.69%.

PDBZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDBZX and ABNFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer