PDBZX vs. ABNFX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX).
PDBZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 14, 1997. ABNFX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Aug 4, 2008.
Performance
PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | -0.53% | 7.70% | 2.87% | 7.70% | -14.33% | -1.46% | 8.01% | 14.76% | -0.72% | 6.60% |
ABNFX American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 | -0.82% | 7.42% | 1.42% | 4.29% | -13.08% | -0.88% | 10.86% | 8.08% | 0.15% | 3.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDBZX achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly higher than ABNFX's -0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBZX has outperformed ABNFX with an annualized return of 2.93%, while ABNFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.93% annualized return.
PDBZX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
ABNFX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- 0.00%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBZX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ABNFX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PDBZX vs. ABNFX — Risk / Return Rank
PDBZX
ABNFX
PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDBZX | ABNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 0.96 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.38 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 1.61 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.12 | 4.66 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDBZX | ABNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 0.96 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.00 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.40 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.64 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between PDBZX and ABNFX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Dividend Comparison
PDBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than ABNFX's 4.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | 4.19% | 4.54% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.73% | 2.73% | 2.94% | 10.36% | 4.01% | 2.87% | 3.92% | 3.33% |
ABNFX American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 | 4.02% | 4.37% | 4.55% | 3.19% | 2.37% | 2.07% | 5.15% | 3.72% | 2.65% | 2.10% | 2.31% | 2.24% |
Drawdowns
PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBZX drawdown since its inception was -20.88%, which is greater than ABNFX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBZX and ABNFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDBZX | ABNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.88% | -17.69% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -2.94% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.81% | -17.65% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.88% | -17.69% | -3.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -2.91% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -3.30% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 1.02% | +0.03% |
Volatility
PDBZX vs. ABNFX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) at 1.51%. This indicates that PDBZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABNFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PDBZX | ABNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 1.51% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.71% | 2.48% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 4.39% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.00% | 5.91% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.34% | 4.87% | +0.47% |