PDBAX vs. SCHX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX).
PDBAX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 10, 1995. SCHX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Performance
PDBAX vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PDBAX vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund | -0.65% | 7.50% | 1.82% | 6.51% | -14.52% | -1.77% | 7.78% | 14.71% | -0.97% | 6.30% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | -4.45% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDBAX achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's -4.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBAX has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 2.52%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.93% annualized return.
PDBAX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
SCHX
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- -4.45%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 13.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDBAX vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PDBAX vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
PDBAX
SCHX
PDBAX vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDBAX | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.96 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.46 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.49 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | 6.98 | -2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDBAX | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.96 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.65 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.77 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.80 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between PDBAX and SCHX is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
PDBAX vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
PDBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than SCHX's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund | 3.95% | 4.27% | 3.76% | 3.55% | 5.49% | 2.47% | 2.68% | 10.32% | 3.74% | 2.60% | 3.65% | 2.94% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.17% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Drawdowns
PDBAX vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBAX drawdown since its inception was -21.24%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBAX and SCHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDBAX | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.24% | -34.33% | +13.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.07% | -12.19% | +9.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | -25.41% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.24% | -34.33% | +13.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -6.40% | +3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -4.00% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 2.60% | -1.54% |
Volatility
PDBAX vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) is 1.63%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that PDBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PDBAX | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.63% | 5.31% | -3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 9.64% | -6.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 18.33% | -13.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.99% | 17.14% | -11.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.32% | 18.13% | -12.81% |