PDBAX vs. PJFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX).
PDBAX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 10, 1995. PJFAX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Nov 2, 1995.
Performance
PDBAX vs. PJFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PDBAX vs. PJFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund | -0.65% | 7.50% | 1.82% | 6.51% | -14.52% | -1.77% | 7.78% | 14.71% | -0.97% | 6.30% |
PJFAX PGIM Jennison Growth Fund | -14.26% | 14.53% | 48.10% | 52.76% | -37.89% | 15.65% | 55.66% | 45.04% | -1.24% | 36.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDBAX achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly higher than PJFAX's -14.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBAX has underperformed PJFAX with an annualized return of 2.52%, while PJFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.50% annualized return.
PDBAX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
PJFAX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -9.01%
- YTD
- -14.26%
- 6M
- -13.47%
- 1Y
- 9.15%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 17.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDBAX vs. PJFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFAX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PDBAX vs. PJFAX — Risk / Return Rank
PDBAX
PJFAX
PDBAX vs. PJFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDBAX | PJFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.41 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 0.74 | +0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.10 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 0.34 | +1.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | 1.18 | +3.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDBAX | PJFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.41 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.43 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.73 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.48 | +0.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between PDBAX and PJFAX is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
PDBAX vs. PJFAX - Dividend Comparison
PDBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than PJFAX's 15.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund | 3.95% | 4.27% | 3.76% | 3.55% | 5.49% | 2.47% | 2.68% | 10.32% | 3.74% | 2.60% | 3.65% | 2.94% |
PJFAX PGIM Jennison Growth Fund | 15.65% | 13.42% | 24.62% | 7.23% | 2.77% | 14.67% | 9.02% | 16.27% | 6.06% | 5.85% | 4.12% | 6.90% |
Drawdowns
PDBAX vs. PJFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBAX drawdown since its inception was -21.24%, smaller than the maximum PJFAX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBAX and PJFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDBAX | PJFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.24% | -64.07% | +42.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.07% | -17.76% | +14.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | -43.56% | +22.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.24% | -43.56% | +22.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -17.76% | +15.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -20.44% | +17.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 5.17% | -4.11% |
Volatility
PDBAX vs. PJFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) is 1.63%, while PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that PDBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PDBAX | PJFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.63% | 5.66% | -4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 12.53% | -9.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 22.18% | -17.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.99% | 24.77% | -18.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.32% | 23.95% | -18.63% |