PDBA vs. SPHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ).
PDBA and SPHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PDBA is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Aug 24, 2022. SPHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Quality Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2005.
Performance
PDBA vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PDBA vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.26% | -0.76% | 34.16% | 7.83% | -1.60% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 0.57% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -2.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDBA achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly higher than SPHQ's 0.57% return.
PDBA
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 7.26%
- 6M
- 5.71%
- 1Y
- 7.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHQ
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -6.75%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDBA vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PDBA vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PDBA
SPHQ
PDBA vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDBA | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 0.86 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 1.34 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.18 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 1.46 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | 6.45 | -4.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDBA | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 0.86 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.50 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between PDBA and SPHQ is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PDBA vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
PDBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than SPHQ's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.10% | 3.32% | 13.01% | 6.82% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.19% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Drawdowns
PDBA vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBA drawdown since its inception was -12.45%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBA and SPHQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDBA | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.45% | -57.83% | +45.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.05% | -10.84% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.75% | +6.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -10.78% | +6.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 2.45% | +1.85% |
Volatility
PDBA vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) is 2.68%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that PDBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PDBA | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | 5.40% | -2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.72% | 9.64% | -2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 17.13% | -5.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 16.40% | -3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 17.81% | -4.46% |