PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDAVX vs. RAPZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDAVX vs. RAPZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (PDAVX) and Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDAVX achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly lower than RAPZX's 13.04% return.


PDAVX

1D
0.45%
1M
0.00%
6M
2.97%
YTD
5.39%
1Y
12.84%
3Y*
9.69%
5Y*
2.57%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.34%

RAPZX

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.93%
6M
7.94%
YTD
13.04%
1Y
16.53%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
6.60%
ALL TIME*
4.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PDAVX vs. RAPZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDAVX
PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund
5.39%14.21%5.48%7.60%-16.77%6.51%12.87%14.84%-9.55%15.83%
RAPZX
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc
13.04%11.96%4.35%3.88%-2.05%23.51%-0.84%17.77%-8.44%6.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PDAVX and RAPZX is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between PDAVX and RAPZX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDAVX vs. RAPZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PDAVX
PDAVX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PDAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PDAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

RAPZX
RAPZX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RAPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RAPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PDAVX vs. RAPZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (PDAVX) and Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDAVXRAPZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.32

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

2.68

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.85

7.48

-2.64

PDAVX vs. RAPZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDAVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the RAPZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDAVX and RAPZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDAVX vs. RAPZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDAVX drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, smaller than the maximum RAPZX drawdown of -30.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDAVX and RAPZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDAVXRAPZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.58%

-30.69%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-6.26%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.17%

-8.84%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-19.31%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-2.70%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.16%

-8.01%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.23%

+0.29%

Volatility

PDAVX vs. RAPZX - Volatility Comparison

PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (PDAVX) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) at 2.10%. This indicates that PDAVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAPZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDAVXRAPZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

2.10%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

6.97%

+3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

10.37%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.60%

12.76%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.52%

12.71%

-2.19%

PDAVX vs. RAPZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDAVX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than RAPZX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDAVX vs. RAPZX - Dividend Comparison

PDAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than RAPZX's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDAVX
PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund
1.65%1.74%2.35%2.74%0.00%5.28%1.19%1.38%2.54%5.75%0.00%0.00%
RAPZX
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc
1.23%1.44%3.20%2.71%3.08%9.61%1.71%2.85%2.06%1.76%2.83%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDAVX and RAPZX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDAVX has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to RAPZX (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDAVX dropped -25.58% vs RAPZX's -30.69%.

RAPZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDAVX and RAPZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer