PDAVX vs. GGSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (PDAVX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX).
PDAVX is managed by PineBridge. It was launched on Mar 1, 2016. GGSIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998.
Performance
PDAVX vs. GGSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PDAVX vs. GGSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDAVX PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund | -5.54% | 14.21% | 5.48% | 7.60% | -16.77% | 6.51% | 12.87% | 14.84% | -9.55% | 15.83% |
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio | -4.20% | 19.29% | 19.26% | 17.83% | -16.86% | 17.04% | 14.34% | 24.92% | -10.65% | 20.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDAVX achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly lower than GGSIX's -4.20% return.
PDAVX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- YTD
- -5.54%
- 6M
- -4.66%
- 1Y
- 8.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
GGSIX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- -4.20%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDAVX vs. GGSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDAVX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GGSIX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PDAVX vs. GGSIX — Risk / Return Rank
PDAVX
GGSIX
PDAVX vs. GGSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (PDAVX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDAVX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 1.15 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.02 | 1.54 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.23 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 1.07 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.42 | 4.87 | -1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDAVX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 1.15 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.63 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.44 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between PDAVX and GGSIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PDAVX vs. GGSIX - Dividend Comparison
PDAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than GGSIX's 12.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDAVX PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund | 1.84% | 1.74% | 2.35% | 2.74% | 0.00% | 5.28% | 1.19% | 1.38% | 2.54% | 5.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio | 12.39% | 11.87% | 12.21% | 1.73% | 5.76% | 6.57% | 3.47% | 5.77% | 3.02% | 2.77% | 1.35% | 2.03% |
Drawdowns
PDAVX vs. GGSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDAVX drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, smaller than the maximum GGSIX drawdown of -52.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDAVX and GGSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDAVX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.58% | -52.85% | +27.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -10.84% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -26.74% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.89% | -8.71% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -9.25% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.51% | -0.29% |
Volatility
PDAVX vs. GGSIX - Volatility Comparison
PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (PDAVX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) at 4.54%. This indicates that PDAVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PDAVX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 4.54% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.97% | 8.19% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 13.32% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.20% | 13.34% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 14.27% | -3.90% |