PCY vs. QQQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM).
PCY and QQQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PCY is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DB Emerging Market USD Liquid Balanced Index. It was launched on Oct 11, 2007. QQQM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020. Both PCY and QQQM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PCY vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCY vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | -2.08% | 16.31% | 2.55% | 18.48% | -24.47% | -4.30% | 5.37% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | -5.92% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCY achieves a -2.08% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's -5.92% return.
PCY
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -4.45%
- YTD
- -2.08%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 10.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- 2.50%
QQQM
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -5.92%
- 6M
- -3.59%
- 1Y
- 23.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCY vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCY vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
PCY
QQQM
PCY vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCY | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 1.06 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 1.65 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.89 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.20 | 6.96 | -0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCY | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.06 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.59 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.63 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCY and QQQM is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PCY vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
PCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | 6.08% | 5.93% | 6.65% | 6.48% | 6.81% | 4.80% | 4.45% | 4.78% | 4.93% | 4.80% | 5.19% | 5.46% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PCY vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCY drawdown since its inception was -49.13%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCY and QQQM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCY | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.13% | -35.04% | -14.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.37% | -12.55% | +6.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.17% | -35.04% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.49% | -8.99% | +4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -8.47% | +1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 3.41% | -1.68% |
Volatility
PCY vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) is 3.99%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that PCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCY | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 6.48% | -2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.34% | 12.73% | -7.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.22% | 22.42% | -12.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 22.25% | -9.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 22.27% | -9.35% |