PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PCT vs. HYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PCT vs. HYG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PCT (PureCycle Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. Over the past 5 years, PCT returned -7.02%/yr vs 3.81%/yr for HYG. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PCT vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCT achieves a 62.40% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.51% return.

PCT

1D
2.35%
1M
82.35%
YTD
62.40%
6M
44.86%
1Y
40.48%
3Y*
21.64%
5Y*
-7.02%
10Y*
—

HYG

1D
0.19%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.84%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*
4.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCT vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PCT
PureCycle Technologies, Inc.		62.40%-16.20%153.09%-40.09%-29.36%-40.67%58.14%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF		1.51%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PCT and HYG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2020

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PureCycle Technologies, Inc.

iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Often compared with PCT:
PCT vs. QQQPCT vs. SPYPCT vs. WMPCT vs. LNWPCT vs. AVGOPCT vs. GLDPCT vs. MSFT
Often compared with HYG:
HYG vs. LQDHYG vs. JNKHYG vs. SPHYHYG vs. AGGHYG vs. USHYHYG vs. HYGHHYG vs. SHYG

Return for Risk

PCT vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PCT
PCT Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCT vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

PCTHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.51
1.72

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.31
2.59

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.33

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

2.79

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

12.34

-11.33

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCT vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCT Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCT and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

PCTHYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

1.72

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.51

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.59

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.46

-0.40

Drawdowns

PCT vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCT drawdown since its inception was -92.66%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCT and HYG.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PCTHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.66%

-34.25%

-58.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.09%

-2.34%

-67.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.73%

-4.56%

-75.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.61%

-15.79%

-74.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-22.03%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.33%

-0.09%

-57.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.19%

-3.24%

-59.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.93%

0.53%

+39.40%

Volatility

PCT vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) has a higher volatility of 28.14% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.21%. This indicates that PCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PCTHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.14%

1.21%

+26.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.25%

3.01%

+60.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.37%

3.81%

+76.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

92.36%

7.53%

+84.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.07%

8.29%

+82.78%

Dividends

PCT vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

PCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF		5.91%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%
PCT
PureCycle Technologies, Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

PCT and HYG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCT has higher volatility (28.14%) compared to HYG (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCT dropped -92.66% vs HYG's -34.25%.

HYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCT and HYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer