PCSIX vs. TIBDX
Compare and contrast key facts about PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX).
PCSIX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 24, 1995. TIBDX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Jul 1, 1999.
Performance
PCSIX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCSIX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSIX PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments | -0.19% | 7.36% | 3.62% | 8.02% | -13.84% | -0.71% | 9.38% | 10.37% | -1.17% | 5.46% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | -0.48% | 7.38% | 1.95% | 5.63% | -13.68% | -0.95% | 8.10% | 9.57% | -0.64% | 4.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCSIX achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly higher than TIBDX's -0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PCSIX has outperformed TIBDX with an annualized return of 2.65%, while TIBDX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.01% annualized return.
PCSIX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- 2.65%
TIBDX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCSIX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCSIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCSIX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank
PCSIX
TIBDX
PCSIX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCSIX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 0.98 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 1.38 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.73 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.48 | 5.37 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCSIX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 0.98 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.03 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.43 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.95 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCSIX and TIBDX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PCSIX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison
PCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than TIBDX's 4.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSIX PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments | 5.28% | 4.76% | 5.66% | 5.03% | 3.47% | 3.71% | 5.62% | 3.50% | 3.39% | 2.66% | 4.23% | 3.55% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 4.03% | 4.34% | 3.60% | 3.22% | 2.44% | 2.39% | 4.45% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 2.93% | 3.80% | 4.68% |
Drawdowns
PCSIX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCSIX drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, roughly equal to the maximum TIBDX drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSIX and TIBDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCSIX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -18.82% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.70% | -2.98% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.54% | -18.82% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.54% | -18.82% | +0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -2.34% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -2.31% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 0.96% | -0.14% |
Volatility
PCSIX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison
PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) have volatilities of 1.49% and 1.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCSIX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 1.54% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.40% | 2.56% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 4.25% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 5.59% | -0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 4.71% | +0.12% |