PCSIX vs. PCEMX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PCSIX (PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments) and PCEMX (PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments) are both mutual funds - PCSIX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by UBS, while PCEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by UBS. Over the past 10 years, PCSIX returned 2.62%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for PCEMX. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. PCSIX charges 0.66%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for PCEMX.

Performance

PCSIX vs. PCEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) and PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCSIX achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than PCEMX's 27.67% return. Over the past 10 years, PCSIX has underperformed PCEMX with an annualized return of 2.62%, while PCEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.17% annualized return.

PCSIX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 5.34%
• 3Y*: 5.56%
• 5Y*: 0.93%
• 10Y*: 2.62%

PCEMX

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 4.41%
• YTD: 27.67%
• 6M: 29.35%
• 1Y: 56.04%
• 3Y*: 21.85%
• 5Y*: 8.37%
• 10Y*: 10.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCSIX vs. PCEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCSIX PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments	0.91%	7.36%	3.62%	8.02%	-13.84%	-0.71%	9.38%	10.37%	-1.17%	5.46%
PCEMX PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments	27.67%	36.75%	4.15%	10.33%	-18.97%	-1.79%	20.13%	19.01%	-16.42%	34.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PCSIX and PCEMX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995	-0.06

The correlation between PCSIX and PCEMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCSIX vs. PCEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCSIX

PCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 36
PCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
PCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
PCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
PCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

PCEMX

PCEMX Risk / Return Rank: 89
PCEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PCEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PCEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PCEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PCEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCSIX vs. PCEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) and PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCSIX	PCEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	3.12	-1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	3.76	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.57	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	4.20	-1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.79	15.67	-8.89

PCSIX vs. PCEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the PCEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCSIX and PCEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCSIX vs. PCEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCSIX drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum PCEMX drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSIX and PCEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCSIX	PCEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.54%	-65.32%	+46.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.57%	-14.42%	+11.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.39%	-18.18%	+12.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.54%	-35.85%	+17.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.54%	-39.17%	+20.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-1.82%	+1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-20.84%	+18.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	3.73%	-2.89%

Volatility

PCSIX vs. PCEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) is 1.09%, while PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that PCSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCSIX	PCEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	8.66%	-7.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.68%	16.99%	-14.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.73%	19.38%	-15.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.48%	17.77%	-12.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.85%	17.62%	-12.77%

PCSIX vs. PCEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCSIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than PCEMX's 1.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCSIX vs. PCEMX - Dividend Comparison

PCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than PCEMX's 3.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCEMX PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments	3.84%	4.91%	1.22%	1.44%	2.52%	11.70%	1.10%	1.04%	1.84%	1.16%	1.09%	1.09%
PCSIX PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments	5.16%	4.76%	5.66%	5.03%	3.47%	3.71%	5.62%	3.50%	3.39%	2.66%	4.23%	3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCSIX and PCEMX in my portfolio?

PCSIX and PCEMX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCSIX or PCEMX?

PCEMX has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to PCSIX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCSIX dropped -18.54% vs PCEMX's -65.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.