PCSG vs. QQQN

Last updated Jul 24, 2026

PCSG (Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. PCSG is actively managed, while QQQN is passively managed. PCSG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

PCSG vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PCSG

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -10.84%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PCSG Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF	$3.95K	$14.31K	$29.15K
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PCSG vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PCSG Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF	-6.75%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

PCSG vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

PCSG vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCSG drawdown since its inception was -14.30%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSG and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCSG	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.30%	0.00%	-14.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.11%	0.00%	-13.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.04%	0.00%	-5.04%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCSG	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.31%	0.00%	+35.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.31%	0.00%	+35.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.31%	0.00%	+35.31%

PCSG vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCSG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCSG vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

Neither PCSG nor QQQN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PCSG or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCSG or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PCSG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCSG or QQQN?

PCSG and QQQN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PCSG and QQQN?

They also come from different issuers: Polen and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PCSG and 0.18% for QQQN.