PCSFX vs. FICVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX).
PCSFX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Mar 13, 2014. FICVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 19, 2009.
Performance
PCSFX vs. FICVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCSFX vs. FICVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSFX Principal Capital Securities Fund | -1.42% | 8.96% | 12.15% | 6.82% | -11.35% | 3.74% | 7.71% | 17.41% | -4.61% | 11.57% |
FICVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I | 1.37% | 18.28% | 8.11% | 11.39% | -15.38% | 9.93% | 42.46% | 28.58% | -1.31% | 9.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCSFX achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than FICVX's 1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PCSFX has underperformed FICVX with an annualized return of 5.44%, while FICVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.11% annualized return.
PCSFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 9.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
FICVX
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 24.52%
- 3Y*
- 11.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCSFX vs. FICVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCSFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FICVX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCSFX vs. FICVX — Risk / Return Rank
PCSFX
FICVX
PCSFX vs. FICVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCSFX | FICVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | 1.55 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 2.11 | +0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.29 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 2.87 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 10.86 | -2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCSFX | FICVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 1.55 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.40 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | 0.83 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.95 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCSFX and FICVX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PCSFX vs. FICVX - Dividend Comparison
PCSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, less than FICVX's 11.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSFX Principal Capital Securities Fund | 5.63% | 5.80% | 5.50% | 5.75% | 5.68% | 4.57% | 4.88% | 5.43% | 6.07% | 5.14% | 5.08% | 5.78% |
FICVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I | 11.23% | 11.38% | 2.02% | 2.12% | 3.73% | 20.65% | 10.73% | 3.28% | 9.85% | 4.09% | 4.90% | 10.39% |
Drawdowns
PCSFX vs. FICVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCSFX drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum FICVX drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSFX and FICVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCSFX | FICVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.42% | -25.06% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.97% | -7.75% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.67% | -24.20% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.42% | -25.06% | +2.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -6.80% | +3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -5.68% | +3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 2.05% | -1.39% |
Volatility
PCSFX vs. FICVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX) is 1.15%, while Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that PCSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCSFX | FICVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 6.34% | -5.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.60% | 12.08% | -10.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 15.65% | -12.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 13.36% | -9.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 13.50% | -8.46% |