PCS vs. PTRB
PCS (PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF) and PTRB (PGIM Total Return Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCS is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM, while PTRB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PCS returned 3.68% vs 2.24% for PTRB. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PCS charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for PTRB.
Performance
PCS vs. PTRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCS achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly higher than PTRB's -0.52% return.
PCS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PTRB
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- 2.24%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $33.09K | $30.68K | $31.15K | |
| $8.31M | $6.59M | $6.62M |
PCS vs. PTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCS PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF | 1.43% | 2.22% |
PTRB PGIM Total Return Bond ETF | -0.52% | 3.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCS and PTRB is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCS vs. PTRB — Risk / Return Rank
PCS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PTRB
PCS vs. PTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF (PCS) and PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCS | PTRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCS vs. PTRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCS drawdown since its inception was -1.12%, smaller than the maximum PTRB drawdown of -19.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCS and PTRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCS | PTRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -19.17% | +18.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.12% | -2.90% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -2.44% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -7.43% | +7.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.16% | — |
Volatility
PCS vs. PTRB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCS | PTRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58% | 3.94% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.58% | 6.19% | -4.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.58% | 6.19% | -4.61% |
PCS vs. PTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PTRB's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCS vs. PTRB - Dividend Comparison
PCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than PTRB's 5.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCS PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF | 4.78% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTRB PGIM Total Return Bond ETF | 4.77% | 4.73% | 5.10% | 4.62% | 4.07% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCS and PTRB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, PCS leads with 3.68% vs 2.24% for PTRB. On fees, PCS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PCS has performed better with a 3.68% return vs 2.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PCS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PTRB.
PCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 4.77% for PTRB.
PCS is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while PTRB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PCS and 0.49% for PTRB.
Find the right allocation for PCS and PTRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer