PCS vs. FLDB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PCS (PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF) and FLDB (Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCS is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM, while FLDB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

PCS vs. FLDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF (PCS) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCS achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than FLDB's 1.36% return.

PCS

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 1.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLDB

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 6M: 1.82%
• 1Y: 4.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCS vs. FLDB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PCS PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF	1.16%	2.22%
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF	1.36%	1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PCS and FLDB is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

PCS vs. FLDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDB

FLDB Risk / Return Rank: 98
FLDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FLDB Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FLDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FLDB Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCS vs. FLDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF (PCS) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCS	FLDB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.58	3.59	-1.01

Drawdowns

PCS vs. FLDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCS drawdown since its inception was -1.12%, which is greater than FLDB's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCS and FLDB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCS	FLDB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.12%	-0.49%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.05%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.13%	-0.05%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCS	FLDB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.34%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59%	0.90%	+0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.59%	1.31%	+0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.59%	1.31%	+0.28%

PCS vs. FLDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PCS and FLDB have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PCS vs. FLDB - Dividend Comparison

PCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than FLDB's 4.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF	4.45%	4.72%	3.58%
PCS PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF	4.01%	1.92%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCS and FLDB in my portfolio?

PCS and FLDB have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCS or FLDB?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCS or FLDB?

PCS and FLDB have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCS or FLDB?

FLDB has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 4.01% for PCS.

What is the main difference between PCS and FLDB?

PCS is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLDB is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Fidelity.