PCRIX vs. FFGCX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX).
PCRIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 27, 2002. FFGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009.
Performance
PCRIX vs. FFGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCRIX vs. FFGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCRIX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund | 21.21% | 17.05% | 10.59% | -68.64% | 8.94% | 33.35% | 0.79% | 12.29% | -13.77% | 2.71% |
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 22.87% | 28.66% | 2.98% | -5.18% | 20.69% | 26.08% | 6.04% | 17.82% | -13.21% | 17.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCRIX achieves a 21.21% return, which is significantly lower than FFGCX's 22.87% return. Over the past 10 years, PCRIX has underperformed FFGCX with an annualized return of -2.00%, while FFGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.82% annualized return.
PCRIX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 21.21%
- 6M
- 25.18%
- 1Y
- 28.13%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- -8.03%
- 10Y*
- -2.00%
FFGCX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 31.25%
- 1Y
- 52.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCRIX vs. FFGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCRIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FFGCX's 0.94% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCRIX vs. FFGCX — Risk / Return Rank
PCRIX
FFGCX
PCRIX vs. FFGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCRIX | FFGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.76 | 2.57 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 3.09 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.49 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 3.46 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.71 | 17.89 | -8.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCRIX | FFGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 2.57 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.74 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | 0.62 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.35 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCRIX and FFGCX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PCRIX vs. FFGCX - Dividend Comparison
PCRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than FFGCX's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCRIX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund | 4.19% | 5.61% | 8.34% | 16.19% | 46.23% | 22.74% | 1.56% | 4.00% | 5.94% | 8.14% | 0.91% | 5.29% |
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 2.06% | 2.53% | 2.62% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 3.39% | 1.61% | 2.98% | 2.22% | 0.36% | 1.53% | 2.86% |
Drawdowns
PCRIX vs. FFGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCRIX drawdown since its inception was -88.17%, which is greater than FFGCX's maximum drawdown of -57.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRIX and FFGCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCRIX | FFGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.17% | -57.23% | -30.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.49% | -14.64% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.15% | -27.22% | -50.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.15% | -48.43% | -29.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.59% | -2.30% | -78.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.60% | -19.54% | -32.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.83% | +0.32% |
Volatility
PCRIX vs. FFGCX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) at 6.10%. This indicates that PCRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCRIX | FFGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.29% | 6.10% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 13.74% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.70% | 20.49% | -3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.75% | 21.53% | +14.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.18% | 22.54% | +4.64% |