PCRB vs. AFIX
PCRB (Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -) and AFIX (Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PCRB returned 4.53% vs 5.65% for AFIX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PCRB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AFIX.
Performance
PCRB vs. AFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCRB achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than AFIX's 0.31% return.
PCRB
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFIX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 5.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCRB vs. AFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - | -0.32% | 7.21% | -1.81% |
AFIX Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF | 0.31% | 7.52% | -1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCRB and AFIX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between PCRB and AFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCRB vs. AFIX — Risk / Return Rank
PCRB
AFIX
PCRB vs. AFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) and Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCRB | AFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 1.83 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 5.67 | -0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCRB | AFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.43 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.89 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
PCRB vs. AFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCRB drawdown since its inception was -7.20%, which is greater than AFIX's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRB and AFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCRB | AFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -3.33% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.02% | -3.10% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -1.88% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -0.96% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 1.00% | -0.07% |
Volatility
PCRB vs. AFIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) is 1.32%, while Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that PCRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCRB | AFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 1.42% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.66% | 2.87% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 3.97% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.63% | 4.55% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.63% | 4.55% | +1.08% |
PCRB vs. AFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCRB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AFIX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCRB vs. AFIX - Dividend Comparison
PCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.79%, more than AFIX's 5.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AFIX Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF | 5.02% | 4.94% | 0.38% | 0.00% |
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - | 9.79% | 4.30% | 4.38% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, PCRB and AFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AFIX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to PCRB (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCRB dropped -7.20% vs AFIX's -3.33%.
On 1-year performance, AFIX leads with 5.65% vs 4.53% for PCRB. On fees, AFIX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, PCRB has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AFIX has performed better with a 5.65% return vs 4.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AFIX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PCRB.
PCRB has the higher dividend yield at 9.79%, compared with 5.02% for AFIX.
They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PCRB and 0.20% for AFIX.
AFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCRB and AFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer