PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCRB vs. AFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCRB vs. AFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) and Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCRB achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than AFIX's 0.31% return.


PCRB

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
-0.32%
6M
-0.43%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
10Y*

AFIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.22%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCRB vs. AFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PCRB
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
-0.32%7.21%-1.81%
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
0.31%7.52%-1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PCRB and AFIX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024

0.95

The correlation between PCRB and AFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCRB vs. AFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCRB
PCRB Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AFIX
AFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCRB vs. AFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) and Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCRBAFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.83

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.90

5.67

-0.77

PCRB vs. AFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the AFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCRB and AFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCRBAFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.43

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.89

-0.30

Drawdowns

PCRB vs. AFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCRB drawdown since its inception was -7.20%, which is greater than AFIX's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRB and AFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCRBAFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-3.33%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-3.10%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-1.88%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-0.96%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.00%

-0.07%

Volatility

PCRB vs. AFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) is 1.32%, while Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that PCRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCRBAFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

1.42%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

2.87%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

3.97%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.63%

4.55%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.63%

4.55%

+1.08%

PCRB vs. AFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCRB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AFIX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCRB vs. AFIX - Dividend Comparison

PCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.79%, more than AFIX's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
5.02%4.94%0.38%0.00%
PCRB
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
9.79%4.30%4.38%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PCRB and AFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AFIX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to PCRB (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCRB dropped -7.20% vs AFIX's -3.33%.

On 1-year performance, AFIX leads with 5.65% vs 4.53% for PCRB. On fees, AFIX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, PCRB has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AFIX has performed better with a 5.65% return vs 4.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AFIX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PCRB.

PCRB has the higher dividend yield at 9.79%, compared with 5.02% for AFIX.

They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PCRB and 0.20% for AFIX.

AFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCRB and AFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer