PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCONX vs. ANNPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCONX vs. ANNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Convertible Securities Fund (PCONX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PCONX having a 14.11% return and ANNPX slightly lower at 13.57%. Over the past 10 years, PCONX has underperformed ANNPX with an annualized return of 10.72%, while ANNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.45% annualized return.


PCONX

1D
0.03%
1M
-2.63%
6M
8.81%
YTD
14.11%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
10.72%
ALL TIME*
7.79%

ANNPX

1D
-0.32%
1M
-2.91%
6M
8.04%
YTD
13.57%
1Y
28.67%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
7.07%
10Y*
13.45%
ALL TIME*
7.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PCONX vs. ANNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCONX
Putnam Convertible Securities Fund
14.11%11.97%12.60%10.13%-19.27%4.23%44.86%24.32%-2.92%14.41%
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
13.57%22.50%14.13%8.39%-18.65%4.96%55.99%26.45%2.76%15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PCONX and ANNPX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 1993

0.91

The correlation between PCONX and ANNPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCONX vs. ANNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PCONX
PCONX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PCONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCONX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PCONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCONX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ANNPX
ANNPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ANNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ANNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PCONX vs. ANNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Convertible Securities Fund (PCONX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCONXANNPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

3.02

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.20

11.35

-5.15

PCONX vs. ANNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCONX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the ANNPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCONX and ANNPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCONX vs. ANNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCONX drawdown since its inception was -47.70%, smaller than the maximum ANNPX drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCONX and ANNPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCONXANNPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.70%

-55.61%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-9.06%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-13.67%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.48%

-26.85%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.14%

-27.36%

+1.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.89%

-7.00%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-17.38%

+9.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.41%

+0.59%

Volatility

PCONX vs. ANNPX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Convertible Securities Fund (PCONX) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) at 5.22%. This indicates that PCONX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCONXANNPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

5.22%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.06%

12.95%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

15.76%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.14%

13.19%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.26%

13.73%

-0.47%

PCONX vs. ANNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCONX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than ANNPX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCONX vs. ANNPX - Dividend Comparison

PCONX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than ANNPX's 9.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
9.71%11.32%2.31%2.56%1.55%20.74%6.94%5.12%18.79%23.47%2.88%10.63%
PCONX
Putnam Convertible Securities Fund
4.22%6.10%1.48%0.99%0.72%26.98%11.62%7.72%13.92%3.48%2.08%6.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, PCONX and ANNPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PCONX has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to ANNPX (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCONX dropped -47.70% vs ANNPX's -55.61%.

ANNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCONX and ANNPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer