PCN vs. PTTPX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 (PTTPX).
PCN is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 20, 2001. PTTPX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Apr 30, 2008.
Performance
PCN vs. PTTPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCN vs. PTTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | -4.21% | 5.55% | 19.52% | 16.22% | -22.88% | 6.93% | -2.19% | 39.10% | -5.94% | 26.20% |
PTTPX PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 | -1.03% | 9.24% | 2.51% | 5.47% | -14.80% | -0.70% | 8.78% | 8.26% | -0.35% | 5.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCN achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly lower than PTTPX's -1.03% return. Over the past 10 years, PCN has outperformed PTTPX with an annualized return of 8.27%, while PTTPX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.06% annualized return.
PCN
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -6.22%
- 1Y
- -3.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
PTTPX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCN vs. PTTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PTTPX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCN vs. PTTPX — Risk / Return Rank
PCN
PTTPX
PCN vs. PTTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 (PTTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCN | PTTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | 0.98 | -1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | 1.39 | -1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.18 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 1.53 | -1.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | 4.55 | -5.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCN | PTTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 | 0.98 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.07 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.40 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.71 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCN and PTTPX is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PCN vs. PTTPX - Dividend Comparison
PCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.34%, more than PTTPX's 4.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | 11.34% | 10.58% | 10.06% | 10.88% | 12.66% | 7.89% | 7.83% | 7.37% | 9.60% | 7.85% | 11.98% | 10.22% |
PTTPX PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 | 4.04% | 4.37% | 4.51% | 3.04% | 3.53% | 2.48% | 6.01% | 3.87% | 3.02% | 2.53% | 2.92% | 6.54% |
Drawdowns
PCN vs. PTTPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCN drawdown since its inception was -61.12%, which is greater than PTTPX's maximum drawdown of -19.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCN and PTTPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCN | PTTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.12% | -19.36% | -41.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -3.67% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.39% | -19.36% | -14.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.27% | -19.36% | -30.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.71% | -3.11% | -3.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -3.18% | -4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 1.23% | +3.09% |
Volatility
PCN vs. PTTPX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 (PTTPX) at 2.04%. This indicates that PCN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCN | PTTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 2.04% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.64% | 2.98% | +5.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 5.14% | +10.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 6.19% | +10.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 5.17% | +16.80% |