PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTTPX vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTTPX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 (PTTPX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTTPX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly higher than BND's -0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PTTPX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 1.85%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.36% annualized return.


PTTPX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.37%
6M
-0.84%
YTD
-0.50%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
1.85%
ALL TIME*
3.43%

BND

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.20%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
-0.54%
1Y
1.75%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
-0.42%
10Y*
1.36%
ALL TIME*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$451.00M$507.49M$592.68M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PTTPX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTTPX
PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2
-0.50%9.24%2.51%5.47%-14.80%-0.70%8.78%8.26%-0.35%5.03%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.54%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PTTPX and BND is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2008

0.84

The correlation between PTTPX and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTTPX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTTPX
PTTPX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PTTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PTTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTTPX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 (PTTPX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTTPXBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.12

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

0.99

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.21

2.48

+0.73

PTTPX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTTPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTTPX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTTPX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTTPX drawdown since its inception was -19.36%, roughly equal to the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTTPX and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTTPXBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.36%

-18.58%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.70%

-2.68%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.39%

-4.81%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.36%

-17.91%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.36%

-18.58%

-0.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.59%

-3.15%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-3.06%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

1.07%

+0.32%

Volatility

PTTPX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 (PTTPX) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 0.98%. This indicates that PTTPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTTPXBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.98%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.76%

2.90%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.58%

3.70%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.28%

6.03%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.22%

5.53%

-0.31%

PTTPX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTTPX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTTPX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

PTTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than BND's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.69%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
PTTPX
PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2
4.17%4.37%4.51%3.04%3.53%2.48%6.01%3.87%3.02%2.53%2.92%6.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PTTPX and BND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PTTPX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to BND (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTTPX dropped -19.36% vs BND's -18.58%.

PTTPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTTPX and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer