PCN vs. PSLDX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX).
PCN is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 20, 2001. PSLDX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Aug 31, 2007.
Performance
PCN vs. PSLDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCN vs. PSLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | -4.21% | 5.55% | 19.52% | 16.22% | -22.88% | 6.93% | -2.19% | 39.10% | -5.94% | 26.20% |
PSLDX PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I | -9.19% | 12.26% | 17.15% | 27.92% | -43.18% | 25.85% | 37.80% | 60.43% | -9.31% | 33.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCN achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly higher than PSLDX's -9.19% return. Over the past 10 years, PCN has underperformed PSLDX with an annualized return of 8.27%, while PSLDX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.36% annualized return.
PCN
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -6.22%
- 1Y
- -3.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
PSLDX
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -12.58%
- YTD
- -9.19%
- 6M
- -13.68%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCN vs. PSLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PSLDX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCN vs. PSLDX — Risk / Return Rank
PCN
PSLDX
PCN vs. PSLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCN | PSLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | 0.20 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | 0.43 | -0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.06 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 0.16 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | 0.49 | -1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCN | PSLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 | 0.20 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.12 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.58 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.61 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCN and PSLDX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PCN vs. PSLDX - Dividend Comparison
PCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.34%, more than PSLDX's 3.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | 11.34% | 10.58% | 10.06% | 10.88% | 12.66% | 7.89% | 7.83% | 7.37% | 9.60% | 7.85% | 11.98% | 10.22% |
PSLDX PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I | 3.40% | 5.60% | 16.73% | 3.67% | 2.66% | 38.80% | 12.89% | 18.91% | 15.58% | 24.52% | 11.55% | 12.08% |
Drawdowns
PCN vs. PSLDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCN drawdown since its inception was -61.12%, which is greater than PSLDX's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCN and PSLDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCN | PSLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.12% | -55.25% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -19.25% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.39% | -49.32% | +15.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.27% | -49.32% | -0.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.71% | -18.47% | +11.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -10.70% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 6.30% | -1.98% |
Volatility
PCN vs. PSLDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) is 5.81%, while PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that PCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCN | PSLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 7.50% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.64% | 14.03% | -5.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 23.99% | -8.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 22.86% | -6.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 21.31% | +0.66% |