PCMM vs. BSV

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PCMM (BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF) and BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - PCMM is a CLO fund actively managed by BondBloxx, while BSV is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. PCMM is actively managed, while BSV is passively managed. Over the past year, PCMM returned 5.37% vs 3.14% for BSV. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCMM charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BSV.

Performance

PCMM vs. BSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCMM achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.46% return.

PCMM

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 2.09%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 5.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSV

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 6M: 0.55%
• 1Y: 3.14%
• 3Y*: 4.56%
• 5Y*: 1.71%
• 10Y*: 1.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCMM vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PCMM BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF	2.09%	6.30%	0.37%
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares	0.46%	6.00%	-0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PCMM and BSV is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024	0.00

Return for Risk

PCMM vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCMM

PCMM Risk / Return Rank: 54
PCMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
PCMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PCMM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
PCMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
PCMM Martin Ratio Rank: 58

BSV

BSV Risk / Return Rank: 58
BSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BSV Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BSV Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCMM vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCMM	BSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.74	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	2.73	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.33	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	2.45	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.96	8.02	+0.94

PCMM vs. BSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the BSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCMM and BSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCMM vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCMM drawdown since its inception was -4.32%, smaller than the maximum BSV drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCMM and BSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCMM	BSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.32%	-8.54%	+4.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.16%	-1.29%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-8.54%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-8.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-0.46%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.42%	-0.97%	+0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.60%	0.39%	+0.21%

Volatility

PCMM vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.61%. This indicates that PCMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCMM	BSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.81%	0.61%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.64%	1.34%	+1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.49%	1.82%	+1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.90%	2.73%	+2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.90%	2.38%	+2.52%

PCMM vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCMM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCMM vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison

PCMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than BSV's 3.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares	3.99%	3.83%	3.38%	2.46%	1.50%	1.45%	1.79%	2.29%	1.99%	1.65%	1.48%	1.40%
PCMM BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF	6.56%	7.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCMM and BSV in my portfolio?

PCMM and BSV have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCMM or BSV?

PCMM has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to BSV (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCMM dropped -4.32% vs BSV's -8.54%.

Which ETF is better, PCMM or BSV?

On 1-year performance, PCMM leads with 5.37% vs 3.14% for BSV. On fees, BSV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BSV has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PCMM or BSV?

Over the 1-year period, PCMM has performed better with a 5.37% return vs 3.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCMM or BSV?

BSV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for PCMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCMM or BSV?

PCMM has the higher dividend yield at 6.56%, compared with 3.99% for BSV.

What is the main difference between PCMM and BSV?

PCMM is categorized as CLO, while BSV is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for PCMM and 0.03% for BSV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.