PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCLO vs. PFFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCLO vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLO achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than PFFA's 1.89% return.


PCLO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
6M
2.19%
YTD
2.68%
1Y
5.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.14%

PFFA

1D
0.68%
1M
0.64%
6M
0.25%
YTD
1.89%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
11.90%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$90.83K$132.76K$166.26K
$15.43M$17.09M$20.18M

PCLO vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PCLO
Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF
2.68%5.39%0.46%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
1.89%8.22%-2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLO and PFFA is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCLO vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PCLO
PCLO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
PCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PCLO vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCLOPFFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+9.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.70

1.16

+1.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

19.50

1.04

+18.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

120.92

3.00

+117.92

PCLO vs. PFFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCLO Sharpe Ratio is 6.11, which is higher than the PFFA Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCLO and PFFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCLO vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum PFFA drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLO and PFFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLOPFFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-70.52%

+69.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.26%

-6.49%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.63%

+2.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-6.57%

+6.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

2.25%

-2.21%

Volatility

PCLO vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) is 0.22%, while Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) has a volatility of 2.42%. This indicates that PCLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCLOPFFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

2.42%

-2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.68%

6.50%

-5.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84%

7.63%

-6.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.12%

11.60%

-10.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.12%

31.54%

-30.42%

PCLO vs. PFFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFA's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCLO vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison

PCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, less than PFFA's 9.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PCLO
Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF
5.19%5.53%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
9.92%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCLO and PFFA have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFA has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to PCLO (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLO dropped -0.76% vs PFFA's -70.52%.

On 1-year performance, PFFA leads with 6.74% vs 5.10% for PCLO. On fees, PCLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PCLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PFFA has performed better with a 6.74% return vs 5.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PCLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.

PFFA has the higher dividend yield at 9.92%, compared with 5.19% for PCLO.

PCLO is categorized as CLO, while PFFA is Preferred Stock. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PCLO and 1.47% for PFFA.

PCLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.11 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCLO and PFFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer