PCLO vs. CLOO
PCLO (Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF) and CLOO (NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCLO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CLOO.
Performance
PCLO vs. CLOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PCLO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCLO vs. CLOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | 0.82% |
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF | 1.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLO and CLOO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCLO vs. CLOO — Risk / Return Rank
PCLO
CLOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PCLO vs. CLOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) and NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF (CLOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCLO | CLOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 123.58 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCLO vs. CLOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, which is greater than CLOO's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLO and CLOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLO | CLOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -0.04% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.00% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | — | — |
Volatility
PCLO vs. CLOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCLO | CLOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83% | 0.48% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.13% | 0.48% | +0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.13% | 0.48% | +0.65% |
PCLO vs. CLOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCLO vs. CLOO - Dividend Comparison
PCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than CLOO's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | 5.23% | 5.53% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCLO and CLOO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLOO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLOO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PCLO.
PCLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 0.59% for CLOO.
They also come from different issuers: Virtus and New York Life Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PCLO and 0.25% for CLOO.
Find the right allocation for PCLO and CLOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer