PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCLIX vs. CCSZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCLIX vs. CCSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) and Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLIX achieves a 34.47% return, which is significantly higher than CCSZX's 27.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PCLIX has outperformed CCSZX with an annualized return of 12.84%, while CCSZX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.11% annualized return.


PCLIX

1D
0.12%
1M
9.99%
6M
30.10%
YTD
34.47%
1Y
39.18%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
12.84%
ALL TIME*
5.77%

CCSZX

1D
0.08%
1M
6.51%
6M
19.90%
YTD
27.43%
1Y
40.78%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
8.11%
ALL TIME*
2.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PCLIX vs. CCSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCLIX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
34.47%5.76%8.53%0.69%23.32%43.83%-9.18%19.37%-12.02%10.86%
CCSZX
Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund
27.43%15.36%7.11%-6.90%15.80%31.34%-1.17%7.45%-14.09%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLIX and CCSZX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2012

0.87

The correlation between PCLIX and CCSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCLIX vs. CCSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PCLIX
PCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CCSZX
CCSZX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CCSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CCSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PCLIX vs. CCSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) and Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCLIXCCSZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.43

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.39

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.24

11.47

-3.23

PCLIX vs. CCSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the CCSZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCLIX and CCSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCLIX vs. CCSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLIX drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, which is greater than CCSZX's maximum drawdown of -61.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLIX and CCSZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLIXCCSZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.60%

-61.34%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.39%

-11.97%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

-11.97%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.59%

-27.86%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.78%

-34.16%

-17.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.33%

-5.20%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-31.09%

+7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

3.57%

+1.04%

Volatility

PCLIX vs. CCSZX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) at 3.54%. This indicates that PCLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCLIXCCSZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

3.54%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.86%

14.10%

+3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.99%

16.91%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.47%

16.86%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.51%

14.88%

+25.63%

PCLIX vs. CCSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CCSZX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCLIX vs. CCSZX - Dividend Comparison

PCLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.36%, more than CCSZX's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCSZX
Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund
2.35%3.00%8.84%4.42%94.73%36.39%0.13%1.09%18.52%0.09%0.00%0.00%
PCLIX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
10.36%2.45%7.50%5.06%42.60%73.41%0.77%2.46%18.58%12.63%0.16%2.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCLIX and CCSZX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCLIX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to CCSZX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLIX dropped -66.60% vs CCSZX's -61.34%.

CCSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCLIX and CCSZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer