PCLCX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
PCLCX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 24, 1995. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
PCLCX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCLCX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCLCX PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments | -12.90% | 9.86% | 28.05% | 35.17% | -28.18% | 20.18% | 39.70% | 31.99% | -3.18% | -0.27% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.81% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCLCX achieves a -12.90% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's -9.81% return.
PCLCX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -8.67%
- YTD
- -12.90%
- 6M
- -14.31%
- 1Y
- 2.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
SWLGX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -9.81%
- 6M
- -9.30%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCLCX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLCX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCLCX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
PCLCX
SWLGX
PCLCX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCLCX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.16 | 0.83 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.37 | 1.35 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.19 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 1.17 | -1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 4.02 | -4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCLCX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 0.83 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.58 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.70 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLCX and SWLGX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PCLCX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
PCLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.71%, more than SWLGX's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCLCX PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments | 23.71% | 20.66% | 11.94% | 2.09% | 60.17% | 22.81% | 18.38% | 16.53% | 22.05% | 10.32% | 3.30% | 17.60% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.51% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PCLCX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLCX drawdown since its inception was -63.98%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLCX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLCX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.98% | -32.69% | -31.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.06% | -16.16% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.81% | -32.69% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.06% | -13.03% | -4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.42% | -7.13% | -13.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 4.69% | +1.15% |
Volatility
PCLCX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX) is 4.64%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that PCLCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCLCX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 6.73% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.72% | 12.40% | -1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.41% | 22.57% | -3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.94% | 21.52% | +15.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 22.81% | +8.15% |