PCLCX vs. QGRPX
Compare and contrast key facts about PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX).
PCLCX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 24, 1995. QGRPX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Jul 8, 2020.
Performance
PCLCX vs. QGRPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCLCX vs. QGRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCLCX PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments | -10.04% | 9.86% | 28.05% | 35.17% | -28.18% | 20.18% | 20.08% |
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund | -11.21% | 15.51% | 25.13% | 35.52% | -25.57% | 29.14% | 14.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCLCX achieves a -10.04% return, which is significantly higher than QGRPX's -11.21% return.
PCLCX
- 1D
- 3.28%
- 1M
- -4.95%
- YTD
- -10.04%
- 6M
- -11.67%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 13.35%
QGRPX
- 1D
- 3.61%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- -11.21%
- 6M
- -10.79%
- 1Y
- 9.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCLCX vs. QGRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLCX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRPX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCLCX vs. QGRPX — Risk / Return Rank
PCLCX
QGRPX
PCLCX vs. QGRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCLCX | QGRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | 0.54 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | 0.95 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.13 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 0.21 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 0.68 | -0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCLCX | QGRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 0.54 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.51 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.63 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLCX and QGRPX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PCLCX vs. QGRPX - Dividend Comparison
PCLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.96%, more than QGRPX's 6.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCLCX PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments | 22.96% | 20.66% | 11.94% | 2.09% | 60.17% | 22.81% | 18.38% | 16.53% | 22.05% | 10.32% | 3.30% | 17.60% |
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund | 6.94% | 6.16% | 3.62% | 0.42% | 1.00% | 2.84% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PCLCX vs. QGRPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLCX drawdown since its inception was -63.98%, which is greater than QGRPX's maximum drawdown of -30.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLCX and QGRPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLCX | QGRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.98% | -30.28% | -33.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.06% | -17.45% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.81% | -30.28% | -8.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.34% | -14.47% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.42% | -7.65% | -12.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 5.30% | +0.22% |
Volatility
PCLCX vs. QGRPX - Volatility Comparison
PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) have volatilities of 5.91% and 6.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCLCX | QGRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 6.13% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.23% | 11.43% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.66% | 21.16% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.96% | 19.60% | +17.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.97% | 19.43% | +11.54% |