PCL vs. QCON
PCL (PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. PCL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
PCL vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PCL
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCL vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 0.46% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCL vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCL | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PCL vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCL drawdown since its inception was -5.14%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCL and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCL | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | 0.00% | -5.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | 0.00% | -1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | 0.00% | -1.76% |
Volatility
PCL vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCL | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.89% | 0.00% | +7.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 0.00% | +7.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 0.00% | +7.89% |
PCL vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCL vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
PCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 5.31% | 2.52% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PCL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PCL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
PCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PCL and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for PCL and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer