PCL vs. DTLE.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PCL (PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF) and DTLE.L (iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - PCL is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM, while DTLE.L is a Long-Term Bond fund managed by iShares. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for DTLE.L.

Performance

PCL vs. DTLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (DTLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PCL is traded in USD, while DTLE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DTLE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCL achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than DTLE.L's -3.38% return.

PCL

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DTLE.L

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: -1.25%
• YTD: -3.38%
• 6M: -3.26%
• 1Y: 4.52%
• 3Y*: -1.29%
• 5Y*: -9.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCL vs. DTLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF	1.46%	2.51%
DTLE.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist	-3.38%	2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PCL and DTLE.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

PCL vs. DTLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTLE.L

DTLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 12
DTLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
DTLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
DTLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
DTLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
DTLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCL vs. DTLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (DTLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCL	DTLE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	-0.23	+0.84

Drawdowns

PCL vs. DTLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCL drawdown since its inception was -5.14%, smaller than the maximum DTLE.L drawdown of -56.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCL and DTLE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCL	DTLE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.14%	-56.35%	+51.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.78%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-48.02%	+46.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.76%	-27.81%	+26.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.78%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCL	DTLE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.89%	13.20%	-5.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.89%	17.93%	-10.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.89%	17.88%	-9.99%

PCL vs. DTLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DTLE.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PCL vs. DTLE.L - Dividend Comparison

PCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than DTLE.L's 4.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DTLE.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist	4.27%	4.18%	4.75%	3.75%	3.05%	1.76%	1.69%	2.50%	2.88%	0.51%
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF	5.31%	2.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCL and DTLE.L in my portfolio?

PCL and DTLE.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCL or DTLE.L?

On fees, DTLE.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCL or DTLE.L?

DTLE.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCL.

What is the main difference between PCL and DTLE.L?

PCL is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DTLE.L is Long-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PCL and 0.10% for DTLE.L.