PCL vs. BBCB
PCL (PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF) and BBCB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. PCL is actively managed, while BBCB is passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PCL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BBCB.
Performance
PCL vs. BBCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCL achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than BBCB's 2.82% return.
PCL
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBCB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 8.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- —
PCL vs. BBCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 1.46% | 2.51% |
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 2.82% | 2.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCL and BBCB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCL vs. BBCB — Risk / Return Rank
PCL
BBCB
PCL vs. BBCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCL | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.46 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
PCL vs. BBCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCL drawdown since its inception was -5.14%, smaller than the maximum BBCB drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCL and BBCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCL | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -22.48% | +17.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -0.34% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -6.66% | +4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.83% | — |
Volatility
PCL vs. BBCB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCL | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.89% | 4.93% | +2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 7.25% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 7.50% | +0.39% |
PCL vs. BBCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBCB's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PCL vs. BBCB - Dividend Comparison
PCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than BBCB's 7.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 7.15% | 5.02% | 5.22% | 4.22% | 3.39% | 3.47% | 4.59% | 5.25% | 0.20% |
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 5.31% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, PCL and BBCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BBCB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBCB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCL.
BBCB has the higher dividend yield at 7.15%, compared with 5.31% for PCL.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PCL and 0.09% for BBCB.
Find the right allocation for PCL and BBCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer