PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCKEX vs. FRQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCKEX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Retirement Advantage 2065 Fund (PCKEX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCKEX achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly higher than FRQHX's 3.71% return.


PCKEX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.53%
YTD
11.37%
6M
10.48%
1Y
27.00%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*

FRQHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.66%
YTD
3.71%
6M
3.70%
1Y
9.32%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCKEX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PCKEX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2065 Fund
11.37%20.28%15.56%33.53%-18.16%17.98%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.71%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%3.45%

Correlation

The correlation between PCKEX and FRQHX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2021

0.72

The correlation between PCKEX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCKEX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCKEX
PCKEX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PCKEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCKEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCKEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PCKEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCKEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQHX
FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCKEX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2065 Fund (PCKEX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCKEXFRQHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.45

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.88

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.38

12.04

+2.34

PCKEX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCKEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the FRQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCKEX and FRQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCKEX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCKEX drawdown since its inception was -24.84%, which is greater than FRQHX's maximum drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCKEX and FRQHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCKEXFRQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.84%

-16.90%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-3.41%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.95%

-5.15%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.84%

-16.90%

-7.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.41%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-3.77%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

0.81%

+1.14%

Volatility

PCKEX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Retirement Advantage 2065 Fund (PCKEX) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) at 2.04%. This indicates that PCKEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCKEXFRQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

2.04%

+2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

3.70%

+6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.41%

4.36%

+8.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

5.60%

+10.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

5.77%

+10.32%

PCKEX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCKEX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCKEX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

PCKEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than FRQHX's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.40%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%
PCKEX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2065 Fund
6.61%7.36%5.95%5.37%5.36%6.01%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCKEX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCKEX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to FRQHX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCKEX dropped -24.84% vs FRQHX's -16.90%.

PCKEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCKEX and FRQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer