PCI vs. USIG
PCI (PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF) and USIG (iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. PCI is actively managed, while USIG is passively managed. Over the past year, PCI returned 2.75% vs 2.04% for USIG. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. PCI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for USIG.
Performance
PCI vs. USIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCI achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly higher than USIG's -0.49% return.
PCI
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
USIG
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- 6M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 1Y
- 2.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.08%
- 5Y*
- 0.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.00K | $18.29K | $194.16K | |
| $98.77M | $106.12M | $96.97M |
PCI vs. USIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCI PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF | -0.20% | 2.96% |
USIG iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | -0.49% | 3.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCI and USIG is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCI vs. USIG — Risk / Return Rank
PCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USIG
PCI vs. USIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF (PCI) and iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCI | USIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.91 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCI vs. USIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCI drawdown since its inception was -3.04%, smaller than the maximum USIG drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCI and USIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCI | USIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -22.21% | +19.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -2.79% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -2.00% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.65% | -3.40% | +2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.97% | — |
Volatility
PCI vs. USIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCI | USIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 4.07% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 6.81% | -2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 6.82% | -2.68% |
PCI vs. USIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than USIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PCI vs. USIG - Dividend Comparison
PCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, more than USIG's 4.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCI PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF | 5.49% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USIG iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.42% | 4.62% | 4.51% | 3.94% | 3.14% | 2.33% | 2.82% | 3.37% | 3.44% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 3.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, PCI and USIG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On 1-year performance, PCI leads with 2.75% vs 2.04% for USIG. On fees, USIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PCI has performed better with a 2.75% return vs 2.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCI.
PCI has the higher dividend yield at 5.49%, compared with 4.42% for USIG.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PCI and 0.04% for USIG.
Find the right allocation for PCI and USIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer