PCI vs. BUFP
PCI (PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF) and BUFP (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCI is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM, while BUFP is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500. PCI is actively managed, while BUFP is passively managed. Over the past year, PCI returned 2.75% vs 14.24% for BUFP. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PCI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BUFP.
Performance
PCI vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCI achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than BUFP's 7.12% return.
PCI
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BUFP
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- YTD
- 7.12%
- 1Y
- 14.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.13M | $1.22M | $1.53M | |
| $12.00K | $18.29K | $194.16K |
PCI vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCI PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF | -0.20% | 2.96% |
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF | 7.12% | 5.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCI and BUFP is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCI vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank
PCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BUFP
PCI vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF (PCI) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCI | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCI vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCI drawdown since its inception was -3.04%, smaller than the maximum BUFP drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCI and BUFP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCI | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -11.98% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -4.41% | +1.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -0.12% | -1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.65% | -0.97% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.83% | — |
Volatility
PCI vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCI | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 6.48% | -2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 9.30% | -5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 9.30% | -5.16% |
PCI vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCI vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison
PCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, more than BUFP's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.02% |
PCI PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF | 5.49% | 2.18% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCI and BUFP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, BUFP leads with 14.24% vs 2.75% for PCI. On fees, PCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BUFP has performed better with a 14.24% return vs 2.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUFP.
PCI has the higher dividend yield at 5.49%, compared with 0.01% for BUFP.
PCI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BUFP is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PCI and 0.50% for BUFP.
Find the right allocation for PCI and BUFP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer