PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCGRX vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCGRX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund (PCGRX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCGRX achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, PCGRX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 9.76%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.


PCGRX

1D
0.62%
1M
3.12%
YTD
14.68%
6M
13.45%
1Y
28.53%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
9.76%

QQQ

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.96%
YTD
20.41%
6M
19.46%
1Y
40.91%
3Y*
27.47%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
22.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCGRX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCGRX
Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund
14.68%10.84%10.44%12.38%-5.85%28.94%1.81%28.04%-19.52%12.89%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.41%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PCGRX and QQQ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between PCGRX and QQQ has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCGRX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCGRX
PCGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PCGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PCGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCGRX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund (PCGRX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCGRXQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.44

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.92

12.79

+0.13

PCGRX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCGRX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCGRX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCGRX drawdown since its inception was -53.63%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGRX and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCGRXQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.63%

-82.97%

+29.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.99%

-11.96%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.29%

-22.77%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.29%

-35.12%

+14.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.30%

-35.12%

-7.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.99%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-32.73%

+25.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

3.21%

-0.96%

Volatility

PCGRX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund (PCGRX) is 3.71%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that PCGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCGRXQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

8.47%

-4.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

14.20%

-4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.49%

17.67%

-4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

22.64%

-5.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.53%

22.43%

-2.90%

PCGRX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCGRX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCGRX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

PCGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCGRX
Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund
6.27%7.19%9.50%6.92%12.41%14.24%0.71%1.08%12.40%8.35%6.59%10.48%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.49%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCGRX and QQQ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to PCGRX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCGRX dropped -53.63% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCGRX and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer