PCGRX vs. HAMVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PCGRX (Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund) and HAMVX (Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PCGRX returned 9.60%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for HAMVX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PCGRX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HAMVX.

Performance

PCGRX vs. HAMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund (PCGRX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCGRX achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly lower than HAMVX's 16.65% return. Over the past 10 years, PCGRX has underperformed HAMVX with an annualized return of 9.60%, while HAMVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.

PCGRX

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 2.82%
• YTD: 13.06%
• 6M: 14.01%
• 1Y: 28.05%
• 3Y*: 15.69%
• 5Y*: 9.12%
• 10Y*: 9.60%

HAMVX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 3.32%
• YTD: 16.65%
• 6M: 17.88%
• 1Y: 35.32%
• 3Y*: 20.77%
• 5Y*: 10.71%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCGRX vs. HAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCGRX Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund	13.06%	10.84%	10.44%	12.38%	-5.85%	28.94%	1.81%	28.04%	-19.52%	12.89%
HAMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund	16.65%	16.00%	12.10%	16.42%	-5.63%	29.93%	-3.77%	22.93%	-17.82%	12.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PCGRX and HAMVX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2002	0.95

The correlation between PCGRX and HAMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PCGRX vs. HAMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCGRX

PCGRX Risk / Return Rank: 61
PCGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PCGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
PCGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
PCGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PCGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

HAMVX

HAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 86
HAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
HAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
HAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
HAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
HAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCGRX vs. HAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund (PCGRX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCGRX	HAMVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.75	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	3.97	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.48	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	5.41	-1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.88	19.16	-6.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCGRX vs. HAMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the HAMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCGRX and HAMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCGRX	HAMVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	2.75	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.57	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.48	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.40	+0.16

Drawdowns

PCGRX vs. HAMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCGRX drawdown since its inception was -53.63%, smaller than the maximum HAMVX drawdown of -64.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGRX and HAMVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCGRX	HAMVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.63%	-64.17%	+10.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.99%	-6.84%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.29%	-21.04%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.29%	-21.04%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.30%	-51.44%	+9.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.53%	-9.98%	+2.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	1.93%	+0.32%

Volatility

PCGRX vs. HAMVX - Volatility Comparison

Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund (PCGRX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCGRX	HAMVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.19%	3.24%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.54%	9.24%	+0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.37%	13.45%	-0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.62%	18.83%	-1.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.52%	21.90%	-2.38%

PCGRX vs. HAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCGRX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than HAMVX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCGRX vs. HAMVX - Dividend Comparison

PCGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, less than HAMVX's 7.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund	7.43%	8.67%	5.77%	7.20%	8.24%	1.27%	2.35%	3.10%	8.41%	3.84%	3.06%	3.30%
PCGRX Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund	6.36%	7.19%	9.50%	6.92%	12.41%	14.24%	0.71%	1.08%	12.40%	8.35%	6.59%	10.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCGRX and HAMVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, PCGRX and HAMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PCGRX or HAMVX?

HAMVX has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to PCGRX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCGRX dropped -53.63% vs HAMVX's -64.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.