PCGH.L vs. PPH
Compare and contrast key facts about Polar Capital Global Healthcare Trust plc (PCGH.L) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH).
PPH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Performance
PCGH.L vs. PPH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCGH.L vs. PPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCGH.L Polar Capital Global Healthcare Trust plc | -10.72% | 21.81% | 6.15% | -0.26% | 9.02% | 27.51% | 2.99% | 19.19% | -0.51% | 6.27% |
PPH VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF | 3.93% | 13.30% | 9.94% | 1.61% | 14.84% | 18.91% | 2.39% | 14.85% | -0.31% | 5.26% |
Different Trading Currencies
PCGH.L is traded in GBp, while PPH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PPH values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCGH.L achieves a -10.72% return, which is significantly lower than PPH's 3.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PCGH.L has outperformed PPH with an annualized return of 9.95%, while PPH has yielded a comparatively lower 8.98% annualized return.
PCGH.L
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -9.20%
- YTD
- -10.72%
- 6M
- 3.55%
- 1Y
- 12.95%
- 3Y*
- 6.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
PPH
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- YTD
- 3.93%
- 6M
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 17.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCGH.L vs. PPH — Risk / Return Rank
PCGH.L
PPH
PCGH.L vs. PPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polar Capital Global Healthcare Trust plc (PCGH.L) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCGH.L | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.91 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 1.37 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.17 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 1.52 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | 3.39 | -0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCGH.L | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.91 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.82 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.52 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCGH.L and PPH is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PCGH.L vs. PPH - Dividend Comparison
PCGH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than PPH's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCGH.L Polar Capital Global Healthcare Trust plc | 0.59% | 0.57% | 0.69% | 0.64% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.86% | 0.84% | 0.99% | 1.17% | 2.08% | 2.15% |
PPH VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.06% | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% |
Drawdowns
PCGH.L vs. PPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCGH.L drawdown since its inception was -33.84%, which is greater than PPH's maximum drawdown of -24.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGH.L and PPH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCGH.L | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.84% | -51.45% | +17.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.80% | -10.02% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.06% | -20.26% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.84% | -29.70% | -4.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.99% | -5.56% | -8.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -17.38% | +12.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.75% | 3.88% | +0.87% |
Volatility
PCGH.L vs. PPH - Volatility Comparison
Polar Capital Global Healthcare Trust plc (PCGH.L) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) at 4.98%. This indicates that PCGH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCGH.L | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.12% | 4.98% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 11.95% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.18% | 19.48% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 14.56% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 17.42% | +0.67% |