PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PCGH.L vs. HTGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


PCGH.LHTGC
YTD Return16.53%26.58%
1Y Return29.04%35.61%
3Y Return (Ann)8.57%16.49%
5Y Return (Ann)12.73%18.78%
10Y Return (Ann)9.68%13.32%
Sharpe Ratio2.381.64
Sortino Ratio3.651.96
Omega Ratio1.441.34
Calmar Ratio2.081.95
Martin Ratio10.526.53
Ulcer Index2.76%5.45%
Daily Std Dev12.17%21.72%
Max Drawdown-33.84%-68.29%
Current Drawdown-4.26%-6.62%

Fundamentals


PCGH.LHTGC
Market Cap£463.25M$3.22B
EPS£0.09$2.04
PE Ratio5.979.71
Total Revenue (TTM)£73.19M$507.35M
Gross Profit (TTM)£70.70M$452.75M
EBITDA (TTM)£70.24M-$39.64M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between PCGH.L and HTGC is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

PCGH.L vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PCGH.L achieves a 16.53% return, which is significantly lower than HTGC's 26.58% return. Over the past 10 years, PCGH.L has underperformed HTGC with an annualized return of 9.68%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.32% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.24%
6.00%
PCGH.L
HTGC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PCGH.L vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polar Capital Global Healthcare Trust plc (PCGH.L) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCGH.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PCGH.L, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.12
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PCGH.L, currently valued at 3.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PCGH.L, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.39
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PCGH.L, currently valued at 2.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PCGH.L, currently valued at 8.50, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.50
HTGC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.72
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 2.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.04
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.02
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 6.77, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.77

PCGH.L vs. HTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCGH.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the HTGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCGH.L and HTGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.12
1.72
PCGH.L
HTGC

Dividends

PCGH.L vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison

PCGH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than HTGC's 10.51% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PCGH.L
Polar Capital Global Healthcare Trust plc
0.63%0.64%0.60%0.65%0.86%0.84%0.50%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.02%2.40%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
8.08%11.40%14.90%9.34%9.57%9.49%11.40%9.45%8.79%10.17%8.33%6.77%

Drawdowns

PCGH.L vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCGH.L drawdown since its inception was -33.84%, smaller than the maximum HTGC drawdown of -68.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGH.L and HTGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-7.19%
-6.62%
PCGH.L
HTGC

Volatility

PCGH.L vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Polar Capital Global Healthcare Trust plc (PCGH.L) is 3.84%, while Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that PCGH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.84%
5.58%
PCGH.L
HTGC

Financials

PCGH.L vs. HTGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Polar Capital Global Healthcare Trust plc and Hercules Capital, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. PCGH.L values in GBp, HTGC values in USD