PCG vs. CP
PCG (PG&E Corporation) and CP (Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited) are both stocks. PCG operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while CP operates in Railroads (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PCG returned -11.79%/yr vs 13.73%/yr for CP. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PCG vs. CP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCG achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than CP's 22.92% return. Over the past 10 years, PCG has underperformed CP with an annualized return of -11.79%, while CP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.73% annualized return.
PCG
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 29.30%
- 3Y*
- -0.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- -11.79%
CP
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 26.46%
- YTD
- 22.92%
- 1Y
- 11.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.68%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
PCG vs. CP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCG PG&E Corporation | 7.46% | -19.72% | 12.25% | 10.95% | 33.94% | -2.57% | 14.63% | -54.23% | -47.02% | -24.51% |
CP Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited | 22.92% | 2.60% | -7.84% | 6.85% | 4.71% | 4.64% | 37.33% | 45.04% | -1.81% | 29.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCG and CP is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1983 | 0.20 |
The correlation between PCG and CP shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PCG:
$37.81B
CP:
$80.00B
PCG:
$1.31
CP:
$4.49
PCG:
13.11
CP:
20.08
PCG:
1.50
CP:
5.46
PCG:
1.01
CP:
1.71
PCG:
$25.83B
CP:
$14.98B
PCG:
$11.87B
CP:
$8.47B
PCG:
$10.55B
CP:
$8.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCG vs. CP — Risk / Return Rank
PCG
CP
PCG vs. CP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PG&E Corporation (PCG) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCG | CP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.10 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 0.67 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.70 | 1.28 | +2.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCG vs. CP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCG drawdown since its inception was -94.65%, which is greater than CP's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCG and CP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCG | CP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.65% | -69.17% | -25.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.82% | -15.50% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.63% | -25.88% | -13.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.63% | -25.88% | -13.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.65% | -33.70% | -60.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.40% | -1.03% | -74.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.57% | -20.26% | -6.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.63% | 8.56% | -0.93% |
Volatility
PCG vs. CP - Volatility Comparison
PG&E Corporation (PCG) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CP) at 6.17%. This indicates that PCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCG | CP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 6.17% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.40% | 17.32% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.40% | 22.69% | +3.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.05% | 24.35% | +3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.57% | 25.52% | +34.05% |
Dividends
PCG vs. CP - Dividend Comparison
PCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than CP's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CP Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited | 0.76% | 0.86% | 0.76% | 0.78% | 0.96% | 0.84% | 0.76% | 0.93% | 1.07% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.98% |
PCG PG&E Corporation | 1.02% | 0.78% | 0.27% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.46% | 3.17% | 3.42% |
Financials
PCG vs. CP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PG&E Corporation and Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PCG vs. CP - Profitability Comparison
PCG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PG&E Corporation reported a gross profit of 5.85B and revenue of 6.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.0%.
CP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited reported a gross profit of 2.55B and revenue of 3.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.0%.
PCG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PG&E Corporation reported an operating income of 1.47B and revenue of 6.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.4%.
CP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited reported an operating income of 1.26B and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.0%.
PCG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PG&E Corporation reported a net income of 885.00M and revenue of 6.88B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
CP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited reported a net income of 846.00M and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in a net margin of 22.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PCG and CP have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCG has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to CP (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCG dropped -94.65% vs CP's -69.17%.
PCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCG and CP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer