PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCFT.L vs. USLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PCFT.L vs. USLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc (PCFT.L) and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PCFT.L is traded in GBp, while USLM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the USLM values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCFT.L achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly higher than USLM's -8.91% return. Over the past 10 years, PCFT.L has underperformed USLM with an annualized return of 12.96%, while USLM has yielded a comparatively higher 27.22% annualized return.


PCFT.L

1D
1.98%
1M
4.75%
YTD
2.19%
6M
6.09%
1Y
16.27%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
12.96%

USLM

1D
2.39%
1M
0.05%
YTD
-8.91%
6M
-17.26%
1Y
10.69%
3Y*
38.36%
5Y*
32.62%
10Y*
27.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCFT.L vs. USLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCFT.L
Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc
2.19%24.68%31.76%0.81%-9.24%25.38%0.85%23.02%-13.01%16.15%
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
-8.91%-16.04%193.95%56.12%22.90%14.77%23.42%29.90%-1.76%-6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between PCFT.L and USLM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013

0.10

Fundamentals

EPS

PCFT.L:

£0.90

USLM:

$6.07

PE Ratio

PCFT.L:

2.56

USLM:

17.87

PEG Ratio

PCFT.L:

0.00

USLM:

0.46

PS Ratio

PCFT.L:

3.04

USLM:

6.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

PCFT.L:

£184.77M

USLM:

$369.31M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PCFT.L:

£181.04M

USLM:

$177.91M

EBITDA (TTM)

PCFT.L:

£232.42M

USLM:

$185.83M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCFT.L vs. USLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCFT.L
PCFT.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PCFT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCFT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCFT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PCFT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCFT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

USLM
USLM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
USLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
USLM Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
USLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
USLM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCFT.L vs. USLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc (PCFT.L) and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCFT.LUSLMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.09

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

0.41

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.06

0.94

+3.12

PCFT.L vs. USLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCFT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the USLM Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCFT.L and USLM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCFT.L vs. USLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCFT.L drawdown since its inception was -40.17%, smaller than the maximum USLM drawdown of -48.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCFT.L and USLM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCFT.LUSLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.17%

-48.20%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.08%

-25.91%

+13.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-48.20%

+33.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.05%

-48.20%

+21.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.17%

-48.20%

+8.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-35.24%

+34.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.92%

-15.26%

+7.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

11.41%

-7.41%

Volatility

PCFT.L vs. USLM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc (PCFT.L) is 3.20%, while United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) has a volatility of 9.29%. This indicates that PCFT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCFT.LUSLMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

9.29%

-6.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

32.34%

-19.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.47%

39.92%

-24.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

35.66%

-18.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.85%

36.73%

-16.88%

Dividends

PCFT.L vs. USLM - Dividend Comparison

PCFT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than USLM's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCFT.L
Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc
3.93%2.76%2.40%3.01%2.88%2.54%3.10%2.95%3.31%2.55%2.71%3.90%
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
0.22%0.20%0.15%0.35%0.57%0.50%0.56%6.52%0.76%0.70%0.66%0.91%

Financials

PCFT.L vs. USLM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
-11.96M
87.83M
(PCFT.L) Total Revenue
(USLM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PCFT.L values in GBP, USLM values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


PCFT.L and USLM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCFT.L and USLM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer