PCFIX vs. GTTTX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PCFIX (PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund) and GTTTX (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PCFIX returned 14.13%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for GTTTX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PCFIX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GTTTX.

Performance

PCFIX vs. GTTTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFIX) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCFIX achieves a 18.63% return, which is significantly lower than GTTTX's 21.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PCFIX has underperformed GTTTX with an annualized return of 14.13%, while GTTTX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.

PCFIX

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 5.11%
• YTD: 18.63%
• 6M: 15.58%
• 1Y: 36.56%
• 3Y*: 22.52%
• 5Y*: 8.84%
• 10Y*: 14.13%

GTTTX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 21.95%
• 6M: 19.36%
• 1Y: 44.12%
• 3Y*: 32.42%
• 5Y*: 15.58%
• 10Y*: 15.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCFIX vs. GTTTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCFIX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund	18.63%	6.78%	20.88%	18.04%	-12.46%	39.43%	9.77%	21.53%	-12.19%	12.90%
GTTTX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class	21.95%	12.83%	45.27%	17.37%	-13.66%	32.94%	0.21%	23.37%	-10.83%	7.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PCFIX and GTTTX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2011	0.95

The correlation between PCFIX and GTTTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PCFIX vs. GTTTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCFIX

PCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 71
PCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
PCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
PCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

GTTTX

GTTTX Risk / Return Rank: 87
GTTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
GTTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GTTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
GTTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GTTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCFIX vs. GTTTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFIX) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCFIX	GTTTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	2.49	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	3.46	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.42	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.30	5.06	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.79	17.80	-4.02

PCFIX vs. GTTTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the GTTTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCFIX and GTTTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCFIX vs. GTTTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCFIX drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, smaller than the maximum GTTTX drawdown of -56.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCFIX and GTTTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCFIX	GTTTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.02%	-56.58%	+4.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.87%	-9.16%	+0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.08%	-39.29%	+11.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.76%	-39.29%	+10.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.02%	-47.29%	-4.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.53%	-0.36%	-2.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.82%	-9.91%	+2.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	2.59%	+0.16%

Volatility

PCFIX vs. GTTTX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFIX) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) at 5.40%. This indicates that PCFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTTTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCFIX	GTTTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	5.40%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.88%	12.69%	+0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.10%	18.66%	-0.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.16%	35.35%	-12.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.87%	30.81%	-5.94%

PCFIX vs. GTTTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCFIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than GTTTX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCFIX vs. GTTTX - Dividend Comparison

PCFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than GTTTX's 6.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTTTX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class	6.88%	8.39%	52.07%	1.87%	3.85%	40.18%	0.90%	0.90%	12.37%	11.87%	4.51%	7.00%
PCFIX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund	4.05%	2.24%	6.12%	2.12%	13.29%	224.73%	18.00%	2.63%	12.78%	9.33%	0.00%	26.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCFIX and GTTTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, PCFIX and GTTTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PCFIX or GTTTX?

PCFIX has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to GTTTX (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCFIX dropped -52.02% vs GTTTX's -56.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.