PCFAX vs. PSLDX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PCFAX (PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund) and PSLDX (PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - PCFAX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by PIMCO, while PSLDX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, PCFAX returned 13.53%/yr vs 14.53%/yr for PSLDX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCFAX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PSLDX.

Performance

PCFAX vs. PSLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCFAX achieves a 18.44% return, which is significantly higher than PSLDX's 9.13% return. Over the past 10 years, PCFAX has underperformed PSLDX with an annualized return of 13.53%, while PSLDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.53% annualized return.

PCFAX

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 6.15%
• YTD: 18.44%
• 6M: 17.06%
• 1Y: 38.48%
• 3Y*: 22.44%
• 5Y*: 8.59%
• 10Y*: 13.53%

PSLDX

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 4.66%
• YTD: 9.13%
• 6M: 8.17%
• 1Y: 30.30%
• 3Y*: 19.16%
• 5Y*: 5.52%
• 10Y*: 14.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCFAX vs. PSLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund	18.44%	6.44%	20.44%	17.64%	-12.75%	38.96%	9.25%	21.17%	-12.42%	12.52%
PSLDX PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I	9.13%	20.34%	15.41%	27.93%	-43.18%	25.85%	37.80%	60.43%	-9.31%	33.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PCFAX and PSLDX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2014	0.56

The correlation between PCFAX and PSLDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (10 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCFAX vs. PSLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCFAX

PCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 63
PCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
PCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

PSLDX

PSLDX Risk / Return Rank: 42
PSLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
PSLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
PSLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
PSLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
PSLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCFAX vs. PSLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCFAX	PSLDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.98	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	2.66	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.35	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.28	2.36	+1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.84	9.56	+4.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCFAX vs. PSLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the PSLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCFAX and PSLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCFAX	PSLDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	1.98	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.24	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.68	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.67	-0.22

Drawdowns

PCFAX vs. PSLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCFAX drawdown since its inception was -52.29%, smaller than the maximum PSLDX drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCFAX and PSLDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCFAX	PSLDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.29%	-55.25%	+2.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-13.70%	+4.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.18%	-24.03%	-4.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.91%	-49.32%	+20.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.29%	-49.32%	-2.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-1.10%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.11%	-10.64%	+1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	3.38%	-0.62%

Volatility

PCFAX vs. PSLDX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) have volatilities of 5.61% and 5.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCFAX	PSLDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.61%	5.37%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.32%	13.13%	-0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.85%	16.38%	+1.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.19%	22.71%	+0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.87%	21.32%	+3.55%

PCFAX vs. PSLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCFAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than PSLDX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCFAX vs. PSLDX - Dividend Comparison

PCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than PSLDX's 9.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund	2.51%	2.26%	6.30%	1.99%	13.66%	235.35%	18.04%	2.29%	12.48%	8.98%	0.00%	26.20%
PSLDX PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I	9.54%	12.92%	15.23%	3.67%	2.66%	38.80%	12.89%	18.91%	15.58%	24.52%	11.55%	12.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCFAX and PSLDX in my portfolio?

PCFAX and PSLDX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCFAX or PSLDX?

PCFAX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to PSLDX (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCFAX dropped -52.29% vs PSLDX's -55.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.