PCFAX vs. HWSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX).
PCFAX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Sep 30, 2011. HWSAX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jun 10, 2000.
Performance
PCFAX vs. HWSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCFAX vs. HWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund | -2.26% | 6.44% | 20.44% | 17.64% | -12.75% | -38.68% | 9.25% | 21.17% | -12.42% | 12.52% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 7.13% | 1.38% | 4.77% | 18.56% | 2.81% | 35.32% | -0.50% | 20.26% | -15.23% | 7.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCFAX achieves a -2.26% return, which is significantly lower than HWSAX's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, PCFAX has underperformed HWSAX with an annualized return of 2.97%, while HWSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.77% annualized return.
PCFAX
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -7.53%
- YTD
- -2.26%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 13.98%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- -8.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.97%
HWSAX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- 16.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCFAX vs. HWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PCFAX and HWSAX have an expense ratio of 1.21%.
Return for Risk
PCFAX vs. HWSAX — Risk / Return Rank
PCFAX
HWSAX
PCFAX vs. HWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCFAX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 0.72 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 1.15 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.16 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 0.91 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 3.37 | -0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCFAX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 0.72 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | 0.42 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 0.40 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.47 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCFAX and HWSAX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PCFAX vs. HWSAX - Dividend Comparison
PCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than HWSAX's 0.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund | 3.04% | 2.26% | 6.30% | 1.99% | 13.66% | 100.48% | 18.04% | 2.29% | 12.48% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 26.20% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 0.65% | 0.69% | 8.19% | 1.79% | 13.39% | 0.22% | 0.63% | 4.62% | 9.45% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 11.67% |
Drawdowns
PCFAX vs. HWSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCFAX drawdown since its inception was -68.63%, roughly equal to the maximum HWSAX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCFAX and HWSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCFAX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.63% | -72.14% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.66% | -16.44% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.63% | -26.98% | -41.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.63% | -53.82% | -14.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.97% | -2.78% | -45.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.60% | -11.03% | -14.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 4.43% | -0.51% |
Volatility
PCFAX vs. HWSAX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that PCFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCFAX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 4.15% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.61% | 12.90% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.79% | 23.98% | -1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.01% | 21.70% | +12.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.34% | 24.64% | +5.70% |