PCF vs. LCFYX
PCF (High Income Securities Fund) and LCFYX (Lord Abbett Convertible Fund) are both Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, PCF returned 5.49%/yr vs 11.91%/yr for LCFYX. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PCF vs. LCFYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCF achieves a -7.81% return, which is significantly lower than LCFYX's 12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PCF has underperformed LCFYX with an annualized return of 5.49%, while LCFYX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.91% annualized return.
PCF
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- 6M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- -7.81%
- 1Y
- -5.80%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- -0.68%
- 10Y*
- 5.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.04%
LCFYX
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- 6M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 23.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $275.34K | $274.09K | $326.49K |
PCF vs. LCFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCF High Income Securities Fund | -7.81% | 5.31% | 16.66% | 10.45% | -15.56% | 11.44% | 8.13% | 4.22% | 5.46% | 14.58% |
LCFYX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund | 12.01% | 22.27% | 13.91% | 7.25% | -23.24% | 1.34% | 64.36% | 24.25% | -5.76% | 16.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCF and LCFYX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2003 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCF vs. LCFYX — Risk / Return Rank
PCF
LCFYX
PCF vs. LCFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for High Income Securities Fund (PCF) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCF | LCFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.23 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 1.98 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 7.62 | -8.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCF vs. LCFYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCF drawdown since its inception was -53.82%, which is greater than LCFYX's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCF and LCFYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCF | LCFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.82% | -39.17% | -14.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | -11.20% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.74% | -12.16% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.06% | -30.74% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.13% | -33.42% | -11.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.67% | -8.56% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.48% | -8.37% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | 2.90% | +2.18% |
Volatility
PCF vs. LCFYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for High Income Securities Fund (PCF) is 3.77%, while Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that PCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCF | LCFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 5.80% | -2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | 13.83% | -3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.94% | 16.85% | -4.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 13.43% | +2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 13.83% | +3.71% |
Dividends
PCF vs. LCFYX - Dividend Comparison
PCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.30%, more than LCFYX's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCFYX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund | 1.40% | 1.88% | 2.31% | 2.06% | 2.73% | 18.40% | 16.22% | 8.76% | 4.99% | 2.54% | 3.72% | 3.48% |
PCF High Income Securities Fund | 13.30% | 11.57% | 11.29% | 11.29% | 13.48% | 10.82% | 11.46% | 3.29% | 6.88% | 3.97% | 4.52% | 5.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCF and LCFYX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCFYX has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to PCF (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCF dropped -53.82% vs LCFYX's -39.17%.
LCFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCF and LCFYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer