PCF vs. CHI
PCF (High Income Securities Fund) and CHI (Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund) are both Convertible Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PCF returned 6.21%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for CHI. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PCF vs. CHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCF achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly lower than CHI's 25.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PCF has underperformed CHI with an annualized return of 6.21%, while CHI has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.
PCF
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- -3.92%
- 6M
- -4.38%
- 1Y
- 0.18%
- 3Y*
- 9.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 6.21%
CHI
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 25.49%
- 6M
- 23.37%
- 1Y
- 39.44%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
PCF vs. CHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCF High Income Securities Fund | -3.92% | 5.31% | 16.66% | 10.45% | -15.56% | 11.44% | 8.13% | 4.22% | 5.46% | 14.58% |
CHI Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund | 25.49% | -2.15% | 27.23% | 9.49% | -23.31% | 20.31% | 33.82% | 35.66% | -12.67% | 22.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCF and CHI is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2002 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCF vs. CHI — Risk / Return Rank
PCF
CHI
PCF vs. CHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for High Income Securities Fund (PCF) and Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund (CHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCF | CHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 2.39 | -2.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.10 | 3.24 | -3.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.43 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | 3.70 | -3.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.04 | 14.63 | -14.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCF | CHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 2.39 | -2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.34 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.57 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.41 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
PCF vs. CHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCF drawdown since its inception was -53.82%, smaller than the maximum CHI drawdown of -64.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCF and CHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCF | CHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.82% | -64.72% | +10.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | -10.71% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.74% | -27.52% | +13.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.06% | -36.03% | +6.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.13% | -49.64% | +4.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.86% | -0.93% | -4.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.50% | -9.67% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 2.70% | +1.38% |
Volatility
PCF vs. CHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for High Income Securities Fund (PCF) is 2.55%, while Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund (CHI) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that PCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCF | CHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 6.61% | -4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.01% | 13.49% | -4.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.49% | 16.56% | -6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 20.03% | -4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 23.18% | -5.69% |
Dividends
PCF vs. CHI - Dividend Comparison
PCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.55%, more than CHI's 8.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHI Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund | 8.96% | 10.88% | 9.55% | 11.00% | 10.85% | 7.54% | 6.75% | 8.49% | 12.19% | 10.19% | 11.30% | 11.50% |
PCF High Income Securities Fund | 12.55% | 11.57% | 11.29% | 11.29% | 13.48% | 10.82% | 11.46% | 3.29% | 6.88% | 3.97% | 4.52% | 5.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCF and CHI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHI has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to PCF (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCF dropped -53.82% vs CHI's -64.72%.
CHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCF and CHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer