PCEWX vs. PONAX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

PCEWX (PIMCO Climate Bond Fund) and PONAX (PIMCO Income Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - PCEWX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by PIMCO, while PONAX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 5 years, PCEWX returned 0.67%/yr vs 3.07%/yr for PONAX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCEWX charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for PONAX.

Performance

PCEWX vs. PONAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Climate Bond Fund (PCEWX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCEWX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than PONAX's 0.64% return.

PCEWX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: -0.51%
• 1Y: 2.95%
• 3Y*: 4.97%
• 5Y*: 0.67%
• 10Y*: —

PONAX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 0.64%
• 6M: 1.30%
• 1Y: 7.56%
• 3Y*: 7.34%
• 5Y*: 3.07%
• 10Y*: 4.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCEWX vs. PONAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PCEWX PIMCO Climate Bond Fund	0.19%	5.87%	3.47%	8.17%	-13.18%	0.11%	6.61%	0.00%
PONAX PIMCO Income Fund Class A	0.64%	10.63%	5.02%	8.96%	-9.34%	2.21%	5.40%	1.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PCEWX and PONAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2019	0.79

The correlation between PCEWX and PONAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCEWX vs. PONAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCEWX

PCEWX Risk / Return Rank: 10
PCEWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
PCEWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
PCEWX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
PCEWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
PCEWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

PONAX

PONAX Risk / Return Rank: 38
PONAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
PONAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PONAX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
PONAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
PONAX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCEWX vs. PONAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Climate Bond Fund (PCEWX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCEWX	PONAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	1.78	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	2.64	-1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.34	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.81	1.98	-1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.44	6.76	-4.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCEWX vs. PONAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCEWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the PONAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCEWX and PONAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCEWX	PONAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	1.78	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	0.64	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	1.48	-1.15

Drawdowns

PCEWX vs. PONAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCEWX drawdown since its inception was -17.54%, which is greater than PONAX's maximum drawdown of -13.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEWX and PONAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCEWX	PONAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.54%	-13.64%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.39%	-3.69%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.39%	-3.90%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.54%	-13.64%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-13.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-1.22%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-1.79%	-3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	1.08%	+0.04%

Volatility

PCEWX vs. PONAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Climate Bond Fund (PCEWX) is 1.21%, while PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that PCEWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PONAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCEWX	PONAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.21%	1.68%	-0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.72%	3.25%	-0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.38%	4.13%	-0.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.36%	4.81%	-0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.49%	4.21%	+0.28%

PCEWX vs. PONAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCEWX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than PONAX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCEWX vs. PONAX - Dividend Comparison

PCEWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than PONAX's 5.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCEWX PIMCO Climate Bond Fund	3.28%	3.34%	3.52%	2.53%	5.55%	2.56%	2.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PONAX PIMCO Income Fund Class A	5.44%	5.61%	5.86%	5.86%	4.66%	3.62%	4.48%	5.42%	5.24%	4.97%	5.13%	7.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCEWX and PONAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, PCEWX and PONAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PCEWX or PONAX?

PONAX has higher volatility (1.68%) compared to PCEWX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCEWX dropped -17.54% vs PONAX's -13.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PONAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.